Countries citing papers authored by W. T. Luke Teacy
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of W. T. Luke Teacy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. T. Luke Teacy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. T. Luke Teacy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. T. Luke Teacy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. T. Luke Teacy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. T. Luke Teacy. The network helps show where W. T. Luke Teacy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. T. Luke Teacy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. T. Luke Teacy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. T. Luke Teacy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with W. T. Luke Teacy. W. T. Luke Teacy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Venanzi, Matteo, W. T. Luke Teacy, Alex Rogers, & Nicholas R. Jennings. (2015). Bayesian modelling of community-based multidimensional trust in participatory sensing under data sparsity. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 717–724.6 indexed citations
Teacy, W. T. Luke, Jing Nie, Sally McClean, & Gerard Parr. (2010). Maintaining connectivity in UAV swarm sensing. Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University). 1771–1776.36 indexed citations
8.
Teacy, W. T. Luke, Jing Nie, Sally McClean, et al.. (2009). Collaborative Sensing by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).23 indexed citations
Teacy, W. T. Luke, Nicholas R. Jennings, Alex Rogers, & G. Flucke. (2008). A Hierarchical Bayesian Trust Model based on Reputation and Group Behaviour. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).12 indexed citations
12.
Teacy, W. T. Luke, Trung Dong Huynh, Rajdeep K. Dash, et al.. (2007). The ART of IAM: The Winning Strategy for the 2006 Competition. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).11 indexed citations
Patel, Jignesh P., W. T. Luke Teacy, Nicholas R. Jennings, et al.. (2005). CONOISE-G: Agent-based virtual organisations for the Grid. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).3 indexed citations
15.
Patel, Jigar, W. T. Luke Teacy, Nicholas R. Jennings, et al.. (2005). Agent-based virtual organisations for the Grid. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 1151–1152.33 indexed citations
16.
Patel, Jigar, W. T. Luke Teacy, Nicholas R. Jennings, et al.. (2005). Monitoring, Policing and Trust for Grid-Based Virtual Organisations. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).9 indexed citations
17.
Patel, Jigar, W. T. Luke Teacy, Nicholas R. Jennings, et al.. (2005). AAMAS '05: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.94 indexed citations
18.
Teacy, W. T. Luke, Jigar Patel, Nicholas R. Jennings, & G. Flucke. (2005). Coping with inaccurate reputation sources. Research Portal (King's College London). 997–1004.119 indexed citations
19.
Teacy, W. T. Luke. (2005). An Investigation into Trust & Reputation for Agent-Based Virtual Organisations.4 indexed citations
20.
Shao, Jianhua, Vikas Deora, Timothy J. Norman, et al.. (2004). Supporting Formation and Operation of Virtual Organisations in a Grid Environment. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.