W. Schnetter
- Molecular Biology
- Insect Science top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Biotechnology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Aloysius KriegAlois M. HugerG. A. LangenbruchWolfgang WagnerFrank MöhrlenCharlie HodgmanHans Ulrich SchairerKlaus Geider
- Topics
- Insect and Pesticide Research (10 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (10 papers)Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
W. Schnetter
18 papers receiving 449 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Molecular Biology 429
- Insect Science 359
- Plant Science 195
- Biotechnology 37
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 29
Countries citing papers authored by W. Schnetter
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Schnetter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Schnetter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Schnetter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Schnetter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Schnetter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Schnetter. The network helps show where W. Schnetter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Schnetter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Schnetter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Schnetter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Schnetter. W. Schnetter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 | |
| 2 | Why is the scarab specific Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. japonensis strain Buibui inefficient against Melolontha melolontha | 1 |
| 3 | 46 | |
| 4 | Control of the cockchafer Melolontha melolontha in the Kraichgau with NeemAzal-T/S. | 9 |
| 5 | Control of the cockchafer Melolontha melolontha in the Kraichgau with NeemAzal-T/S [azadirachtin] | 1 |
| 6 | Bacillus popilliae: a difficult pathogen | 1 |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | Floating bait formulations increase effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis against Anopheles larvae. | 13 |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 230 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 0 |
About W. Schnetter
W. Schnetter is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecological Modeling and Plant Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (10 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (10 papers) and Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (359 citations), Molecular Biology (429 citations) and Plant Science (195 citations). W. Schnetter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Aloysius Krieg, Alois M. Huger, G. A. Langenbruch, Wolfgang Wagner, Frank Möhrlen, Charlie Hodgman, Hans Ulrich Schairer, Klaus Geider, Mir S. Mulla and Mulla Ms. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, FEMS Microbiology Letters and Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.