Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300–800 GeV
2008616 citationsJ. Chang, O. Ganel et al.profile →
Comparing the statistics of interstellar turbulence in simulations and observations
2010549 citationsChristoph Federrath, Julia Román-Duval et al.Astronomy and Astrophysicsprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Schmidt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Schmidt. The network helps show where W. Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Schmidt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Schmidt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Schmidt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with W. Schmidt. W. Schmidt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schmidt, W., et al.. (2017). LARS: An Absolute Reference Spectrograph for solar observations Upgrade from a prototype to a turn-key system. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).5 indexed citations
6.
Rimmelé, Thomas, Tom Berger, J. P. McMullin, et al.. (2014). The Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope: A Project Update.. amos.
Federrath, Christoph, Julia Román-Duval, Ralf S. Klessen, W. Schmidt, & Mordecai‐Mark Mac Low. (2010). Comparing the statistics of interstellar turbulence in simulations and observations. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 512. A81–A81.549 indexed citations breakdown →
Schlichenmaier, R. & W. Schmidt. (2001). Small-Scale Flow Field in a Sunspot Penumbra. ASPC. 12. 289.1 indexed citations
16.
Schmidt, W., J. Chang, O. Ganel, et al.. (1999). On the identification of high energy cosmic ray electrons in the Advanced Thin Ionization Calorimeter (ATIC). MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 5. 41–44.
17.
Schmidt, W. & T. Kentischer. (1995). Optical system of an Advanced Solar Correlation Tracker.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 113. 363.2 indexed citations
18.
Balthasar, H. & W. Schmidt. (1994). Polarimetry and spectroscopy of a simple sunspot. IV. Umbral structures observed in FeI 1027nm. A&A. 290. 649–654.1 indexed citations
19.
Schmidt, W. & M. Stix. (1983). Two comments of the sun's differential rotation. A&A. 118(1). 1–3.1 indexed citations
20.
Schmidt, W., H. Rosenbauer, J. Geiss, & E. G. Shelley. (1981). Heavy Ions in the Solar Wind - First ISEE-1 Results on Temperatures. 450.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.