W. S. Lewis

443 total citations
14 papers, 105 citations indexed

About

W. S. Lewis is a scholar working on Anthropology, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, W. S. Lewis has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 105 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Anthropology, 4 papers in Geometry and Topology and 3 papers in Mathematical Physics. Recurrent topics in W. S. Lewis's work include Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (3 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). W. S. Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (3 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). W. S. Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United States. W. S. Lewis's co-authors include Chris Brown, Horace Walpole, Harold Williams, Dora Mae Clark, William M. Adams, H. Thomas Karnes, Gerd Kobal, William H. Barr, Bruce Davies and Sunil S. Iyer and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, American Journal of Physics and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

In The Last Decade

W. S. Lewis

11 papers receiving 81 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. S. Lewis United States 6 25 24 18 16 16 14 105
Andrey Marinov Bulgaria 3 16 0.6× 11 0.5× 3 0.2× 3 0.2× 3 38
Umberto Lupo Switzerland 5 39 1.6× 16 0.7× 1 0.1× 4 0.3× 9 0.6× 9 140
Theodore George Rochow United States 5 14 0.6× 6 0.3× 20 1.3× 9 78
R.S. McFadden United States 3 28 1.1× 46 1.9× 21 1.3× 6 64
Joseph Valasek United States 2 19 0.8× 12 0.5× 4 0.3× 3 26
Giulia Sfameni Gasparro Italy 3 24 1.0× 22 0.9× 12 0.8× 19 77
Sergey Chebotaryov Russia 6 26 1.0× 17 0.7× 37 2.3× 8 80
R A Sack 3 15 0.6× 6 0.3× 19 1.2× 5 53
H. Becerril Gonzalez United States 5 8 0.3× 28 1.2× 12 0.8× 8 51
M. Datta United States 6 17 0.7× 114 4.8× 7 0.4× 15 142

Countries citing papers authored by W. S. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. S. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. S. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. S. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. S. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. S. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. S. Lewis. The network helps show where W. S. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. S. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. S. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. S. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. S. Lewis. W. S. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Davies, Bruce, William M. Adams, W. S. Lewis, et al.. (2010). Rapid automated blood sampling system for pharmacokinetics studies of cigarette smoking. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 12(4). 319–325. 3 indexed citations
2.
Lewis, W. S., et al.. (2004). A laboratory on the four-point probe technique. American Journal of Physics. 72(2). 149–153. 55 indexed citations
3.
Lewis, W. S., et al.. (1992). An Orientation Reversing Homeomorphism of the Plane with Invariant Pseudo- Arc. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 114(4). 1145–1145. 4 indexed citations
4.
Lewis, W. S.. (1989). Readership of Buried Ads versus Ads Placed beside Reading Matter. Newspaper Research Journal. 10(2). 67–74. 1 indexed citations
5.
Walpole, Horace, et al.. (1985). Horace Walpole's Miscellaneous Correspondence: The Yale Edition of Horace Walpole's Correspondence.. Eighteenth-Century Studies. 18(3). 426–426. 1 indexed citations
6.
Lewis, W. S.. (1984). Most Maps of the Pseudo-Arc are Homeomorphisms. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 91(1). 147–147. 5 indexed citations
7.
Lewis, W. S.. (1983). Pseudo-Arcs and Connectedness in Homeomorphism Groups. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 87(4). 745–745. 3 indexed citations
8.
Walpole, Horace, et al.. (1980). Horace Walpole's miscellaneous correspondence. Yale University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lewis, W. S.. (1979). Monotone Maps of Hereditarily Indecomposable Continua. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 75(2). 361–361. 6 indexed citations
10.
Lewis, W. S., et al.. (1974). Selected Letters of Horace Walpole. The History Teacher. 8(1). 141–141. 7 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Harold, et al.. (1955). Horace Walpole's Correspondence with Sir Horace Mann. The Modern Language Review. 50(4). 526–526. 10 indexed citations
12.
Clark, Dora Mae, et al.. (1955). The Yale Edition of Horace Walpole's Correspondence. The American Historical Review. 61(1). 116–116. 7 indexed citations
13.
Walpole, Horace, et al.. (1951). Horace Walpole's correspondence with Thomas Chatterton, Michael Lort, John Pinkerton, John Fenn and Mrs Fenn, William Bewley, Nathaniel Hillier. Yale University Press eBooks.
14.
Walpole, Horace, W. S. Lewis, & Charles H. Bennett. (1951). Horace Walpole's correspondence with Sir David Dalrymple. Yale University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrey Marinov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Umberto Lupo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Theodore George Rochow Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R.S. McFadden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joseph Valasek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Giulia Sfameni Gasparro Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sergey Chebotaryov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R A Sack Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by H. Becerril Gonzalez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Datta
Rankless by CCL
2026