W. Neil Everett

637 citations
20 papers · 537 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

W. Neil Everett

20 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

W. Neil Everett
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Aging 27
  • Polymers and Plastics 157
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 51
  • Materials Chemistry 277
  • Biomedical Engineering 197
Replace Tetsu Ouchi with:
Tetsu Ouchi United States
Natalia Erina United States
Klaus Kunze Germany
Alexander Alekseev Russia
Cristiane A. Silva Brazil
Samer Al Akhrass France
Rupak Banerjee India
F. Hajiesmaeilbaigi Iran
Masayuki Iijima Japan
Derek A. Schorzman United States
W. Neil Everett relative to Tetsu Ouchi United States Tetsu Ouchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.7×
Tetsu Ouchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Neil Everett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Neil Everett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Neil Everett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Neil Everett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Neil Everett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Neil Everett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Neil Everett. The network helps show where W. Neil Everett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Neil Everett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Neil Everett Line = papers co-authored together W. Neil Everett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2008230
2 201434
3 200633
4 200632
5 201326
6 201223
7 200722
8 200921
9 200921
10 201015
11 201313
12 201313
13 201513
14 20059
15 20078
16 20078
17 20057
18 20076
19 20102
20 20101

About W. Neil Everett

W. Neil Everett is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (2 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (2 papers) and Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (27 citations), Polymers and Plastics (157 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (51 citations), Materials Chemistry (277 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (197 citations). W. Neil Everett has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Hung‐Jue Sue, Michael A. Bevan, Dimitris C. Lagoudas, D. Davis, Gordon L. Warren, Luyi Sun, Hung‐Jen Wu, Dazhi Sun, Adela Ben‐Yakar and Sertan Kutal Gökçe. Their work appears in journals such as Langmuir, PLoS ONE, Macromolecules, Scientific Reports and Journal of Biomedical Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact