W. M. Mitchell

1.2k citations
14 papers · 974 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

W. M. Mitchell

14 papers receiving 928 citations

Peers

W. M. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 127
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 614
  • Biological Psychiatry 65
  • Neurology 121
  • Toxicology 33
Replace Maria Martire with:
Maria Martire Italy
Isabelle Leroux‐Nicollet France
Debra Berkelhammer United States
Cheng‐Yuan Lai Taiwan
Claudia Bregonzio Argentina
Bertha Prieto-Gómez Mexico
C. Pimoule France
Giorgio Gorini United States
Michal Taler Israel
N.Y. Crysdale United States
W. M. Mitchell relative to Maria Martire Italy Maria Martire's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Maria Martire · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. M. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. M. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. M. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. M. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. M. Mitchell. The network helps show where W. M. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. M. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. M. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together W. M. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1990231
2 1992194
3 1990158
4 199198
5 196165
6 199260
7 199660
8 199050
9 199121
10 199118
11 19686
12 19585
13 19944
14 19614

About W. M. Mitchell

W. M. Mitchell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (2 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (127 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (614 citations), Biological Psychiatry (65 citations), Neurology (121 citations) and Toxicology (33 citations). W. M. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Toshihiro Takao, Daniel E. Tracey, Anita H. Lewin, F. Ivy Carroll, Peter Abraham, Lawrence G. Sharpe, Nancy S. Pilotte, N M Appel, Russell Garlick and E B De Souza. Their work appears in journals such as Endocrinology, European Journal of Pharmacology, Regulatory Peptides, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Heart.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact