W. M. Crooke

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
24 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

W. M. Crooke is a scholar working on Plant Science, Soil Science and Analytical Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, W. M. Crooke has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Plant Science, 8 papers in Soil Science and 4 papers in Analytical Chemistry. Recurrent topics in W. M. Crooke's work include Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (9 papers), Agricultural Science and Fertilization (4 papers) and Heavy Metals in Plants (4 papers). W. M. Crooke is often cited by papers focused on Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (9 papers), Agricultural Science and Fertilization (4 papers) and Heavy Metals in Plants (4 papers). W. M. Crooke collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Armenia. W. M. Crooke's co-authors include A. H. Knight, R. H. E. Inkson, Bryon W. Bache, Ornella Vergnano, JAMES G. HUNTER, H. Shepherd, I. R. MACDONALD, Ian R. MacDonald and J. C. Keay and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Experimental Botany and Plant and Soil.

In The Last Decade

W. M. Crooke

24 papers receiving 945 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Determination of ammonium in Kjeldahl digests of crops by an automated procedure

1971 693 citations W. M. Crooke et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture profile →

Peers

W. M. Crooke

PS

SS

EC

ACS

ECOLO

G. C. Gerloff United States

J.K. Martin Australia

Ian G. Burns United Kingdom

AD Rovira Australia

U. Kafkafi Israel

D. W. Nelson United States

E. E. Schulte United States

J. F. Loneragan Australia

A. W. Johnson United States

F. Azam Pakistan

G. C. Gerloff United States

W. M. Crooke

915 ×1.7

PS

175 ×0.4

SS

491 ×2.2

EC

154 ×0.8

ACS

281 ×1.7

ECOLO

Citations per year, relative to W. M. Crooke W. M. Crooke (= 1×) peers G. C. Gerloff

Countries citing papers authored by W. M. Crooke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. M. Crooke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. M. Crooke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. M. Crooke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. M. Crooke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. M. Crooke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. M. Crooke. The network helps show where W. M. Crooke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. M. Crooke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. M. Crooke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. M. Crooke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. M. Crooke. W. M. Crooke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Bache, Bryon W. & W. M. Crooke. (1981). Interactions between aluminium, phosphorus and pH in the response of barley to soil acidity. Plant and Soil. 61(3). 365–375. 27 indexed citations

2.

Crooke, W. M.. (1980). Effect of soil pH and N fertilization on uptake and fractions of Ca and Mg in two barley cultivars. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 11(9). 917–934. 3 indexed citations

3.

Crooke, W. M.. (1977). Relationship between grain yield and the nitrogen and excess base contents of young barley plants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 28(7). 589–597. 2 indexed citations

4.

Knight, A. H., et al.. (1973). Cation Exchange Capacity, Chemical Composition and the Balance of Carboxylic Acids in the Floral Parts of Various Plant Species. Annals of Botany. 37(1). 159–166. 5 indexed citations

5.

Knight, A. H., W. M. Crooke, & H. Shepherd. (1972). Chemical composition of pollen with particular reference to cation exchange capacity and uronic acid content. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 23(3). 263–274. 26 indexed citations

6.

Crooke, W. M. & A. H. Knight. (1971). Root cation‐exchange capacity and organic acid content of tops as indices of varietal yield. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 22(8). 389–392. 9 indexed citations

7.

Crooke, W. M. & A. H. Knight. (1971). Crop composition in relation to soil pH and root cation‐exchange capacity. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 22(5). 235–241. 14 indexed citations

8.

Crooke, W. M., et al.. (1971). Determination of ammonium in Kjeldahl digests of crops by an automated procedure. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 22(1). 9–10. 693 indexed citations breakdown →

9.

Crooke, W. M., A. H. Knight, & J. C. Keay. (1964). Mineral Composition, Cation-Exchange Properties and Uronic Acid Content of Various Tissues of Conifers. Forest Science. 10(4). 415–427. 2 indexed citations

10.

Crooke, W. M. & A. H. Knight. (1962). AN EVALUATION OF PUBLISHED DATA ON THE MINERAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS IN THE LIGHT OF THE CATION-EXCHANGE CAPACITIES OF THEIR ROOTS. Soil Science. 93(6). 365–373. 33 indexed citations

11.

Knight, A. H., W. M. Crooke, & R. H. E. Inkson. (1961). Cation-Exchange Capacities of Tissues of Higher and Lower Plants and their Related Uronic Acid Contents. Nature. 192(4798). 142–143. 85 indexed citations

12.

Crooke, W. M., A. H. Knight, & Ian R. MacDonald. (1960). Cation exchange properties and pectin content of storage-tissue disks. Plant and Soil. 13(1). 55–67. 12 indexed citations

13.

Crooke, W. M., A. H. Knight, & I. R. MACDONALD. (1960). Cation-exchange capacity and pectin gradients in leek root segments. Plant and Soil. 13(2). 123–127. 15 indexed citations

14.

Crooke, W. M.. (1958). EFFECT OF HEAVY-METAL TOXICITY ON THE CATION-EXCHANGE CAPACITY OF PLANT ROOTS. Soil Science. 86(5). 231–240. 24 indexed citations

15.

Knight, A. H. & W. M. Crooke. (1956). Interaction between Nickel and Calcium in Plants. Nature. 178(4526). 220–220. 10 indexed citations

16.

Crooke, W. M.. (1956). EFFECT OF SOIL REACTION ON UPTAKE OF NICKEL FROM A SERPENTINE SOIL. Soil Science. 81(4). 269–276. 54 indexed citations

17.

Crooke, W. M. & A. H. Knight. (1955). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NICKEL‐TOXICITY SYMPTOMS AND THE ABSORPTION OF IRON AND NICKEL. Annals of Applied Biology. 43(3). 454–464. 20 indexed citations

18.

Crooke, W. M. & R. H. E. Inkson. (1955). The relationship between nickel toxicity and major nutrient supply. Plant and Soil. 6(1). 1–15. 44 indexed citations

19.

Crooke, W. M., JAMES G. HUNTER, & Ornella Vergnano. (1954). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NICKEL TOXICITY AND IRON SUPPLY. Annals of Applied Biology. 41(2). 311–324. 40 indexed citations

20.

Crooke, W. M.. (1954). Effect of Nickel Versenate on Oat Plants. Nature. 173(4400). 403–404. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact