W. Heijbroek
- Plant Science top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Endocrinology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Joan H. de JongW. LangeChristian JungH. ToxopeusH. L. PaulFred A. van EeuwijkD. L. DoneyMichael Kruse
- Topics
- Nematode management and characterization studies (15 papers)Plant Virus Research Studies (8 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
W. Heijbroek
29 papers receiving 287 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Plant Science 330
- Insect Science 79
- Endocrinology 45
- Molecular Biology 33
- Ecology 27
Countries citing papers authored by W. Heijbroek
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Heijbroek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Heijbroek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Heijbroek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Heijbroek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Heijbroek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Heijbroek. The network helps show where W. Heijbroek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Heijbroek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Heijbroek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Heijbroek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Heijbroek. W. Heijbroek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Testing and improving seed vigour in sugar beet. | 3 |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | The existence of possible pathotypes of beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) and their inpact on partially resistant sugar beet varieties | 2 |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | Transfer of beet cyst nematode resistance from Beta species of the section Patellares to cultivated beet. | 18 |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | Susceptibility of plant selections to Heterodera schachtii and a race of H. trifolii parasitic on Sugarbeet in The Netherlands. | 9 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | Some effects of fungal parasites on the population development of the beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schm.). | 10 |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Forecasting incidence of, and issuing warnings about, nematodes, especially Heterodera schachtii and Ditylenchus dipsaci. | 10 |
About W. Heijbroek
W. Heijbroek is a scholar working on Horticulture, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nematode management and characterization studies (15 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (8 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (330 citations), Endocrinology (45 citations) and Insect Science (79 citations). W. Heijbroek has collaborated with scholars based in China, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joan H. de Jong, W. Lange, Christian Jung, H. Toxopeus, H. L. Paul, Fred A. van Eeuwijk, D. L. Doney, Michael Kruse, Wopke van der Werf and R. Rabbinge. Their work appears in journals such as Crop Protection, Euphytica and European Journal of Plant Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.