W. H. Morris‐Jones
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Anthropology top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul R. BrassWinfried HäuserMichael BrecherGeorges FischerMartin MeredithAllen IsaacmanDonald B. RosenthalCraig Baxter
- Topics
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts (11 papers)Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (8 papers)Indian History and Philosophy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaMexico
In The Last Decade
W. H. Morris‐Jones
33 papers receiving 290 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Political Science and International Relations 242
- Sociology and Political Science 154
- Economics and Econometrics 47
- Anthropology 38
- Philosophy 35
Countries citing papers authored by W. H. Morris‐Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of W. H. Morris‐Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. H. Morris‐Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. H. Morris‐Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. H. Morris‐Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. H. Morris‐Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. H. Morris‐Jones. The network helps show where W. H. Morris‐Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. H. Morris‐Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. H. Morris‐Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. H. Morris‐Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. H. Morris‐Jones. W. H. Morris‐Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 87 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | The government and politics in India | 10 |
| 4 | 106 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About W. H. Morris‐Jones
W. H. Morris‐Jones is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Anthropology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Conflicts (11 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (8 papers) and Indian History and Philosophy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (242 citations), Anthropology (38 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (154 citations). W. H. Morris‐Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Brass, Winfried Häuser, Michael Brecher, Georges Fischer, Martin Meredith, Allen Isaacman, Donald B. Rosenthal, Craig Baxter, A. Jeyaratnam Wilson and A. P. Thirlwáll. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, British Journal of Sociology and International Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.