W. Glöckle

13.0k total citations · 4 hit papers
289 papers, 8.1k citations indexed

About

W. Glöckle is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, W. Glöckle has authored 289 papers receiving a total of 8.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 236 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 153 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 25 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in W. Glöckle's work include Nuclear physics research studies (214 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (181 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (89 papers). W. Glöckle is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (214 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (181 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (89 papers). W. Glöckle collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Poland and United States. W. Glöckle's co-authors include H. Kamada, H. Witała, Ulf-G. Meißner, E. Epelbaum, T. F. Nonnenmacher, A. Nogga, J. Golak, D. Hüber, Ch. Elster and T. Cornelius and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

W. Glöckle

282 papers receiving 7.9k citations

Hit Papers

A fractional calculus app... 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 2004 1996 2002 200 400 600

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
W. Glöckle 6.8k 3.3k 805 577 545 289 8.1k
Aurel Bulgac 1.3k 0.2× 3.0k 0.9× 243 0.3× 171 0.3× 185 0.3× 144 4.5k
T. H. R. Skyrme 3.8k 0.6× 2.5k 0.8× 300 0.4× 45 0.1× 226 0.4× 34 6.0k
J. L. Gammel 1.4k 0.2× 1.5k 0.4× 207 0.3× 58 0.1× 412 0.8× 57 2.5k
G. Soff 4.5k 0.7× 6.0k 1.8× 487 0.6× 23 0.0× 1.0k 1.9× 292 8.2k
M. R. Strayer 4.6k 0.7× 3.5k 1.0× 673 0.8× 18 0.0× 419 0.8× 144 6.2k
S. Fubini 4.4k 0.6× 1.7k 0.5× 285 0.4× 24 0.0× 113 0.2× 105 6.0k
Ulrich D. Jentschura 1.1k 0.2× 2.9k 0.9× 314 0.4× 33 0.1× 449 0.8× 208 3.7k
S. Stringari 1.5k 0.2× 19.1k 5.7× 977 1.2× 50 0.1× 117 0.2× 284 20.4k
D. Baye 4.0k 0.6× 4.1k 1.2× 667 0.8× 8 0.0× 570 1.0× 246 5.9k
H. Hassanabadi 2.9k 0.4× 6.2k 1.9× 159 0.2× 189 0.3× 46 0.1× 577 7.9k

Countries citing papers authored by W. Glöckle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Glöckle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Glöckle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Glöckle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Glöckle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Glöckle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Glöckle. The network helps show where W. Glöckle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Glöckle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Glöckle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Glöckle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Glöckle. W. Glöckle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Witała, H. & W. Glöckle. (2012). Di-neutron and the three-nucleon continuum observables. Physical Review C. 85(6). 21 indexed citations
2.
Witała, H., J. Golak, R. Skibiński, et al.. (2010). Relativistic Effects in Neutron–Deuteron Elastic Scattering and Breakup. Few-Body Systems. 49(1-4). 61–64. 7 indexed citations
3.
Witała, H., R. Skibiński, J. Golak, & W. Glöckle. (2009). A novel treatment of the proton-proton Coulomb force in proton-deuteron Faddeev calculations: Elastic scattering. The European Physical Journal A. 41(3). 369–384. 10 indexed citations
4.
Golak, J., W. Glöckle, A. Nogga, et al.. (2006). Testing nuclear forces by polarization transfer coefficients ind(p,p)dandd(p,d)preactions atEplab=22.7MeV. Physical Review C. 73(4). 15 indexed citations
5.
Kistryn, St., R. Bieber, A. Biegun, et al.. (2003). Evidence of three-nucleon force effects from130MeVdeuteron-proton breakup cross section measurement. Physical Review C. 68(5). 24 indexed citations
6.
Epelbaum, E., Ulf-G. Meißner, & W. Glöckle. (2003). Quark mass dependence of the nuclear forces. The European Physical Journal A. 18(2-3). 499–502. 1 indexed citations
7.
Nogga, A., H. Kamada, & W. Glöckle. (2002). The HypernucleiHΛ4eandHΛ4: Challenges for Modern Hyperon-Nucleon Forces. Physical Review Letters. 88(17). 172501–172501. 99 indexed citations
8.
Ermisch, K., A. M. van den Berg, R. Bieber, et al.. (2001). Search for Three-Nucleon Force Effects in Analyzing Powers forpdElastic Scattering. Physical Review Letters. 86(26). 5862–5865. 49 indexed citations
9.
Epelbaum, E., et al.. (2001). Three- and Four-Nucleon Systems from Chiral Effective Field Theory. Physical Review Letters. 86(21). 4787–4790. 69 indexed citations
10.
Weber, C., et al.. (2001). A new attempt to determine the neutron–neutron scattering length using the 2H(n,np)n reaction. Nuclear Physics A. 684(1-4). 632–634. 2 indexed citations
11.
Yamamura, H., K. Miyagawa, T. Mart, et al.. (1999). InclusiveK+and exclusiveK+Yphotoproduction on the deuteron:ΛandΣ-threshold phenomena. Physical Review C. 61(1). 25 indexed citations
12.
Kamada, H. & W. Glöckle. (1998). A Momentum Transformation Connecting a NN Potential in the Nonrelativistic and the Relativistic Two-Nucleon Schrödinger Equation. CERN Bulletin. 16 indexed citations
13.
Anderson, B. D., A. R. Baldwin, W. Bertozzi, et al.. (1996). Cross-section measurements for theH2(p,n)2preaction at 135 MeV. Physical Review C. 54(4). 1531–1537. 6 indexed citations
14.
Glöckle, W. & T. F. Nonnenmacher. (1995). A fractional calculus approach to self-similar protein dynamics. Biophysical Journal. 68(1). 46–53. 608 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Witała, H., et al.. (1992). On the Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction in Low-Energy Elastic Nucleon-Deuteron Scattering. Progress of Theoretical Physics. 88(5). 1015–1018. 4 indexed citations
16.
Baumann, Gerd, W. Glöckle, & T. F. Nonnenmacher. (1991). Singular point analysis and integrals of motion for coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 434(1891). 263–278. 12 indexed citations
17.
Stoof, H. T. C., L.P.H. de Goey, B. J. Verhaar, & W. Glöckle. (1988). Spin-polarized atomic hydrogen in very strong magnetic fields. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 38(16). 11221–11224. 6 indexed citations
18.
Glöckle, W. & Y. Nogami. (1987). Relativistic dynamics and Lorentz contraction. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 35(12). 3840–3846. 12 indexed citations
19.
Glöckle, W.. (1973). On the use of generator coordinates in scattering problems. Nuclear Physics A. 211(2). 372–380. 9 indexed citations
20.
Glöckle, W., et al.. (1967). A shell model calculation in the continuum for the reaction 15N(n, n′) 15N. Physics Letters B. 24(8). 361–363. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026