W. G. Riel
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Ecology top 5%
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Papers in
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 5
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 2
- Ecology 8
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 8
- Co-authors
- T. L. ShoreL. SafranyikAllan L. CarrollB. PeterBarry J. CookeStephen TaylorDavid W. LangorVincent G. Nealis
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
W. G. Riel
7 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Insect Science 221
- Ecology 321
- Global and Planetary Change 140
- Ecological Modeling 23
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 60
Countries citing papers authored by W. G. Riel
This map shows the geographic impact of W. G. Riel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. G. Riel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. G. Riel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. G. Riel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. G. Riel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. G. Riel. The network helps show where W. G. Riel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside W. G. Riel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Methods to assess landscape-scale risk of bark beetle infestation to support forest management decisions | 2010 | 1 |
| 2 | 2010 | 316 | |
| 3 | Characterization of the jack pine forests of Western Canada for susceptibility to infestation by the mountain pine beetle. | 2009 | 2 |
| 4 | Dawson creek mountain pine beetle spread analysis: application of the SELES-MPB landscape-scale mountain pine beetle model in the Dawson timber supply area and tree farm license 48. | 2006 | 4 |
| 5 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 6 | Integrating landscape-scale mountain pine beetle projection and spatial harvesting models to assess management strategies | 2004 | 6 |
| 7 | Provincial Level Projection of the Current Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak: An Overview of the model (BCMPB) and Draft Results of Year 1 of the Project | 2004 | 20 |
| 8 | 1999 | 24 |
About W. G. Riel
W. G. Riel is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 8 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (8 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (2 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (1 paper), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper) and Fire effects on ecosystems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (221 citations), Ecology (321 citations), Global and Planetary Change (140 citations), Ecological Modeling (23 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (60 citations). W. G. Riel has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include T. L. Shore, L. Safranyik, Allan L. Carroll, B. Peter, Barry J. Cooke, Stephen Taylor, David W. Langor, Vincent G. Nealis, Jacques Régnière and P. M. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Western Journal of Applied Forestry and The Canadian Entomologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.