W. G. Friend
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- J. J. B. SmithRichard W. MerrittJames A. FergusonJ.L. GringortenJohn G. StoffolanoBernard D. RoitbergF. Michael BarrettLee Smith
- Topics
- Insect Utilization and Effects (27 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
W. G. Friend
84 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Insect Science 839
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 297
- Plant Science 294
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 274
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 251
Countries citing papers authored by W. G. Friend
This map shows the geographic impact of W. G. Friend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. G. Friend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. G. Friend more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. G. Friend
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. G. Friend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. G. Friend. The network helps show where W. G. Friend may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. G. Friend
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. G. Friend. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. G. Friend based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. G. Friend. W. G. Friend is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 126 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | Dietary restrictions and fecal occult blood testing. | 1 |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | A small volume, thermostatically controlled apparatus for feeding radioactive diets to mosquitoes and other sucking arthropods. | 8 |
| 11 | 158 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | The nutritional requirements of Díptera. | 4 |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 56 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About W. G. Friend
W. G. Friend is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (27 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (17 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (839 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (297 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (251 citations). W. G. Friend has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include J. J. B. Smith, Richard W. Merritt, James A. Ferguson, J.L. Gringorten, John G. Stoffolano, Bernard D. Roitberg, F. Michael Barrett, Lee Smith, E. H. Salkeld and Wilfrid Mazier. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Gastroenterology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.