W F Pralong
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Co-authors
- Claes B. WollheimPatrick AebischerNicole DéglonAndrás SpätWilliam Blanco-BoseToufik Abbas‐TerkiJean‐Marc ThelerJozsef Z. Kiss
- Topics
- Pancreatic function and diabetes (17 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (9 papers)Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical Investigation
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
W F Pralong
37 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Surgery 809
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 653
- Genetics 381
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 284
Countries citing papers authored by W F Pralong
This map shows the geographic impact of W F Pralong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W F Pralong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W F Pralong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W F Pralong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W F Pralong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W F Pralong. The network helps show where W F Pralong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W F Pralong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W F Pralong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W F Pralong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W F Pralong. W F Pralong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 | |
| 2 | 71 | |
| 3 | 107 | |
| 4 | 71 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 234 | |
| 9 | 71 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 130 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 101 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About W F Pralong
W F Pralong is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Aging and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 38 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (17 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (9 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (216 citations), Physiology (228 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (653 citations). W F Pralong has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Claes B. Wollheim, Patrick Aebischer, Nicole Déglon, András Spät, William Blanco-Bose, Toufik Abbas‐Terki, Jean‐Marc Theler, Jozsef Z. Kiss, Geneviève Rougon and Vivianne Padrun. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.