W Bounds

674 total citations
24 papers, 515 citations indexed

About

W Bounds is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, W Bounds has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 515 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in W Bounds's work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (14 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (3 papers). W Bounds is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Contraception (14 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (3 papers). W Bounds collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Czechia. W Bounds's co-authors include John Guillebaud, J Guillebaud, Sam Rowlands, Gillian Robinson, Anne Szarewski, David Lowe, Mark Nichols, M P Vessey, IJ Mackie and Margaret Booth and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Haematology, Journal of Clinical Pathology and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

W Bounds

24 papers receiving 460 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W Bounds United Kingdom 14 325 119 110 81 59 24 515
N Loudon United Kingdom 14 262 0.8× 71 0.6× 156 1.4× 70 0.9× 27 0.5× 25 602
J Guillebaud United Kingdom 12 160 0.5× 40 0.3× 94 0.9× 59 0.7× 47 0.8× 24 376
Rosemary Kirkman United Kingdom 11 572 1.8× 300 2.5× 142 1.3× 156 1.9× 36 0.6× 21 712
M. Lawless United Kingdom 8 245 0.8× 62 0.5× 97 0.9× 57 0.7× 22 0.4× 12 462
Margaret Polaneczky United States 13 320 1.0× 95 0.8× 77 0.7× 168 2.1× 21 0.4× 24 587
Kelly Culwell United States 14 465 1.4× 280 2.4× 125 1.1× 81 1.0× 9 0.2× 28 592
Caryn Dutton United States 9 297 0.9× 169 1.4× 99 0.9× 46 0.6× 9 0.2× 24 423
Charletta Ayers United States 8 80 0.2× 51 0.4× 93 0.8× 40 0.5× 28 0.5× 13 405
Burkman Rt United States 6 201 0.6× 68 0.6× 47 0.4× 40 0.5× 49 0.8× 20 309
H. Pamela Pagano United States 6 759 2.3× 387 3.3× 207 1.9× 128 1.6× 30 0.5× 10 1000

Countries citing papers authored by W Bounds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W Bounds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W Bounds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W Bounds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W Bounds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W Bounds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W Bounds. The network helps show where W Bounds may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W Bounds

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W Bounds. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W Bounds based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W Bounds. W Bounds is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bounds, W, et al.. (2003). Comparative trial of the force required for, and pain of, removing GyneFix® versus Gyne-T380S® following randomised insertion. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 29(2). 29–31. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bounds, W, et al.. (2003). Randomised controlled trial assessing the acceptability of GyneFix® versus Gyne-T380S® for emergency contraception. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 29(2). 23–29. 13 indexed citations
3.
Bounds, W & John Guillebaud. (2002). Observational series on women using the contraceptive Mirena® concurrently with anti-epileptic and other enzyme-inducing drugs. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 28(2). 78–80. 44 indexed citations
4.
Bounds, W, Síle F. Molloy, & John Guillebaud. (2002). Pilot study of short-term acceptability and breakage and slippage rates for the loose-fitting polyurethane male condom eZ·onbi-directional: a randomized cross-over trial. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 7(2). 71–78. 5 indexed citations
6.
Bounds, W. (2000). 'CE-Marking' on contraceptive devices: what does it mean?. PubMed. 26(1). 54–5. 1 indexed citations
7.
MacDougall, Jane, et al.. (1999). Bone density in a population of long term oral contraceptive pill users does not differ from that in menstruating women.. PubMed. 25(3). 96–100. 13 indexed citations
8.
Bounds, W & J Guillebaud. (1999). Lea's Shield contraceptive device: pilot study of its short-term patient acceptability and aspects of use.. PubMed. 24(4). 117–20. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bounds, W. (1997). Female condoms. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 2(2). 113–116. 11 indexed citations
10.
Nichols, Mark, et al.. (1993). Effect of four combined oral contraceptives on blood pressure in the pill-free interval. Contraception. 47(4). 367–376. 52 indexed citations
11.
Bounds, W, Anne Szarewski, David Lowe, & John Guillebaud. (1993). Preliminary report of unexpected local reactions to a progestogen-releasing contraceptive vaginal ring. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 48(2). 123–125. 45 indexed citations
12.
Bounds, W, et al.. (1992). Female condom (Femidom). A clinical study of its use-effectiveness and patient acceptability.. 18(2). 36 indexed citations
13.
Bounds, W, et al.. (1992). Randomised comparative study in 217 women of three disposable plastic IUCD thread retrievers. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 99(11). 915–919. 13 indexed citations
14.
Bounds, W, et al.. (1990). Changes in metabolism induced by oral contraceptives containing desogestrel and gestodene in older women. Contraception. 42(3). 263–273. 17 indexed citations
15.
Bounds, W, et al.. (1989). Functional ovarian cysts associated with the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine device.. 14(4). 25 indexed citations
16.
Hirschowitz, Lynn, et al.. (1988). Vasitis nodosa and associated clinical findings.. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 41(4). 419–423. 13 indexed citations
17.
Rowlands, Sam, et al.. (1986). A possible mechanism of action of danazol and an ethinylestradiol/ norgestrel combination used as postcoital contraceptive agents. Contraception. 33(6). 539–545. 51 indexed citations
18.
Rowlands, Sam, John Guillebaud, W Bounds, & Margaret Booth. (1983). Side effects of danazol compared with an ethinyloestradiol/norgestrel combination when used for postcoital contraception. Contraception. 27(1). 39–49. 33 indexed citations
19.
Bounds, W, M P Vessey, & Peter Wiggins. (1979). A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE‐BLIND TRIAL OF TWO LOW DOSE COMBINED ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 86(4). 325–329. 22 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (1974). Progestogen-only oral contraception and ectopic gestation.. BMJ. 4(5936). 104–105. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026