Marie Smith

1.3k total citations
52 papers, 971 citations indexed

About

Marie Smith is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Marie Smith has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 971 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 23 papers in General Health Professions and 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Marie Smith's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (31 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (10 papers). Marie Smith is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (31 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (10 papers). Marie Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Marie Smith's co-authors include Thomas Bodenheimer, David W. Bates, Paul D. Cleary, Susan Spiggle, Brian J. Isetts, Daniel E. Buffington, Linnea A. Polgreen, Barry L. Carter, Paul A. James and Judy Bahnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Health Affairs and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Marie Smith

49 papers receiving 867 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marie Smith United States 16 656 392 245 230 142 52 971
Anne Burns United States 12 694 1.1× 222 0.6× 338 1.4× 210 0.9× 148 1.0× 27 877
Randal P. McDonough United States 15 731 1.1× 309 0.8× 287 1.2× 142 0.6× 84 0.6× 35 896
Melissa Somma McGivney United States 15 659 1.0× 350 0.9× 227 0.9× 184 0.8× 112 0.8× 53 867
Vivienne Mak Australia 18 427 0.7× 267 0.7× 128 0.5× 234 1.0× 139 1.0× 45 841
Scott Cunningham United Kingdom 19 588 0.9× 518 1.3× 115 0.5× 148 0.6× 222 1.6× 92 1.0k
Elizabeth Hall‐Lipsy United States 8 685 1.0× 219 0.6× 258 1.1× 226 1.0× 88 0.6× 18 870
Brian J. Isetts United States 12 642 1.0× 220 0.6× 286 1.2× 211 0.9× 67 0.5× 36 760
June Tordoff New Zealand 19 735 1.1× 412 1.1× 285 1.2× 483 2.1× 104 0.7× 70 1.3k
Fernando Martínez‐Martínez Spain 18 650 1.0× 269 0.7× 286 1.2× 247 1.1× 60 0.4× 63 1.0k
Amy M. Linsky United States 19 528 0.8× 260 0.7× 207 0.8× 312 1.4× 118 0.8× 59 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Marie Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marie Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marie Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie Smith. The network helps show where Marie Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marie Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marie Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marie Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marie Smith. Marie Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2021). PCImpact: A modeling tool for forecasting impact of primary care pharmacist services. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 17(10). 1810–1819. 3 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2021). Primary Care Pharmacist Practice Models Shape the Comprehensive Medication Management Process. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 56(5). 620–625. 5 indexed citations
4.
5.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2019). PharmValCalc: A calculator tool to forecast population health pharmacist impact. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 16(9). 1183–1191. 7 indexed citations
6.
Gernant, Stephanie A., Jennifer L. Bacci, Stefanie P. Ferreri, et al.. (2019). Three opportunities for standardization: A literature review of the variation among pharmacists’ patient care services terminology. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 16(6). 766–775. 33 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2018). Workflow process mapping to characterize office-based primary care medication use and safety: A conceptual approach. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 15(4). 378–386. 8 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2018). Primary care workflow process mapping of medication-related activities performed by non-provider staff: A pilot project's approach. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 15(9). 1107–1117. 8 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Marie. (2017). Implementing primary care pharmacist services: Go upstream in the world of value-based payment models. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 13(5). 892–895. 14 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2016). Variability in state Medicaid medication management initiatives. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 13(1). 214–223. 10 indexed citations
11.
Bowen, Judith L., David A. Hirsh, Eva Aagaard, et al.. (2014). Advancing Educational Continuity in Primary Care Residencies. Academic Medicine. 90(5). 587–593. 24 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2013). Report of the 2012-2013 Standing Committee on Advocacy: Advocacy Tools and Resources: A Framework for Increasing Member Engagement. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 77(10). S17–S17. 3 indexed citations
13.
Adams, Alex J., Gary E. DeLander, George E. MacKinnon, et al.. (2013). Report of the AACP Task Force on Patient-Centered Medical Homes and Accountable Care Organizations. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 77(7). 142–142. 15 indexed citations
14.
Hogue, Michael D., et al.. (2013). Pharmacist engagement in medical home practices: Report of the APhA–APPM Medical Home Workgroup. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 53(2). e118–e124. 9 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2013). Consumer, physician, and payer perspectives on primary care medication management services with a shared resource pharmacists network. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 10(3). 539–553. 34 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2011). An integrated model of complex continuing care: the experience of The Royal Hospital Donnybrook 2009-2010. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -). 1 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Marie, et al.. (2011). Patient-centered medical homes: Primer for pharmacists. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 51(3). e38–e50. 12 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Marie. (2008). Leadership and Advocacy for Pharmacy.. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 72(1). 5 indexed citations
19.
Dignan, Mark, et al.. (1991). Implementation of mass media community health education: the Forsyth County Cervical Cancer Prevention Project. Health Education Research. 6(3). 259–266. 13 indexed citations
20.
Michielutte, Robert, et al.. (1991). Errors in reporting cervical screening among public health clinic patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 44(4-5). 403–408. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026