Vladimir V. Semak
- Computational Mechanics top 2%
- Laser Material Processing Techniques 8
- Mechanical Engineering top 5%
- Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses 3
- Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes 2
- Automotive Engineering top 10%
- Mechanics of Materials top 10%
-
- Ocular and Laser Science Research 4
-
- Plasma Diagnostics and Applications 4
- Laser Design and Applications 3
-
- Plasma Applications and Diagnostics 3
-
- Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics 3
- Co-authors
- Akira MatsunawaAlexandre LikhanskiiDmitry OpaitsSergey MacheretMikhail N. ShneiderRichard B. MilesJeffrey G. ThomasMary Helen McCay
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
Vladimir V. Semak
13 papers receiving 649 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Computational Mechanics 360
- Mechanical Engineering 547
- Metals and Alloys 20
- Automotive Engineering 71
- Mechanics of Materials 115
Countries citing papers authored by Vladimir V. Semak
This map shows the geographic impact of Vladimir V. Semak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vladimir V. Semak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vladimir V. Semak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vladimir V. Semak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vladimir V. Semak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vladimir V. Semak. The network helps show where Vladimir V. Semak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Vladimir V. Semak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 5 | Laser Materials Processing | 2005 | 2 |
| 6 | Trends in microwelding. | 2005 | 1 |
| 7 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 81 | |
| 14 | The role of recoil pressure in energy balance during laser materials processingbreakdown → | 1997 | 542 |
| 15 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 1 |
About Vladimir V. Semak
Vladimir V. Semak is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Computational Mechanics and Biophysics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (8 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (4 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (4 papers), Laser Design and Applications (3 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (3 papers), Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (3 papers), Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics (3 papers) and Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (360 citations), Mechanical Engineering (547 citations) and Metals and Alloys (20 citations). Vladimir V. Semak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Akira Matsunawa, Alexandre Likhanskii, Dmitry Opaits, Sergey Macheret, Mikhail N. Shneider, Richard B. Miles, Jeffrey G. Thomas, Mary Helen McCay, J. T. Schriempf and Danny O’Neill MacCallum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.