Virginia Nazarea
- Plant Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Ecology
- Topics
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers)Culinary Culture and Tourism (3 papers)Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (2 papers)
- Cited by
- General Agricultural and Biological SciencesGeography, Planning and DevelopmentHorticulture
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Virginia Nazarea
15 papers receiving 497 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Plant Science 203
- Global and Planetary Change 135
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 128
- Sociology and Political Science 90
- Ecology 82
Countries citing papers authored by Virginia Nazarea
This map shows the geographic impact of Virginia Nazarea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virginia Nazarea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virginia Nazarea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Virginia Nazarea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Virginia Nazarea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Virginia Nazarea. The network helps show where Virginia Nazarea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Virginia Nazarea
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Virginia Nazarea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Virginia Nazarea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Virginia Nazarea. Virginia Nazarea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Local Knowledge and Memory in Biodiversity Conservation | 1 |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 197 | |
| 5 | Recipes for Life: Counsel, customs, and cuisine from the Andean hearth | 3 |
| 6 | Heirloom Seeds and Their Keepers: Marginality and Memory in the Conservation of Biological Diversity | 42 |
| 7 | 53 | |
| 8 | Costumbres del ayer, Tesoros del mañana: Plantas de herencia, conocimientos ancestrales y bancos de memoria | 2 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Looking at the landscape through local lenses: Integrating community values and variation in indicators of sustainability | 3 |
| 11 | Defining Culturally Relevant Indicators: What Are We Waiting For? | 4 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Ethnoecology: Situated Knowledge/Located Lives | 109 |
| 14 | 59 | |
| 15 | 112 |
About Virginia Nazarea
Virginia Nazarea is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development and Food Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (3 papers) and Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (128 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (76 citations) and Horticulture (10 citations). Virginia Nazarea has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Rhoades, José Antonio Camacho Ballesta and R. Alarcón. Their work appears in journals such as Annual Review of Anthropology, American Journal of Human Biology and Human Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.