Violette Coppens

55 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Violette Coppens
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Biological Psychiatry 401
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 133
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 219
  • Clinical Psychology 237
  • Neurology 90
Replace Vanessa Ota with:
Vanessa Ota Brazil
Dana C. Perantie United States
Matthias K. Auer Germany
Ali Bozkurt Türkiye
Kaj Forslund Sweden
Sigrun Hope Norway
Henriette N. Buttenschøn Denmark
R. Weizman Israel
I Kremer Israel
Agnieszka Samochowiec Poland
Violette Coppens relative to Vanessa Ota Brazil Vanessa Ota's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Vanessa Ota · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Violette Coppens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Violette Coppens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Violette Coppens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Violette Coppens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Violette Coppens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Violette Coppens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Violette Coppens. The network helps show where Violette Coppens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Violette Coppens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Violette Coppens Line = papers co-authored together Violette Coppens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201796
2 201386
3 202167
4 201963
5 201962
6 201655
7 201544
8 202243
9 201843
10 202039
11 201839
12 201937
13 201936
14 201233
15 201832
16 202032
17 202130
18 201429
19 202025
20 202324

About Violette Coppens

Violette Coppens is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (21 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (11 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (7 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (6 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (6 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (401 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (133 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (219 citations), Clinical Psychology (237 citations) and Neurology (90 citations). Violette Coppens has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Manuel Morrens, Wim Huys, Livia De Picker, Bernard Sabbe, Marianne Destoop, Geert Dom, Harry Heimberg, Erik Fransén, Kris Goethals and Maarten Timmers. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychobiology, Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Diabetologia and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact