Peter de Boer

204 papers receiving 6.9k citations

Peers

Peter de Boer
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Biological Psychiatry 934
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 511
  • Nephrology 714
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 409
Replace Daniel T. O’Connor with:
Daniel T. O’Connor United States
Peter Thorén Sweden
Ido P. Kema Netherlands
Mervyn Maze United States
Kiyoshi Matsumura Japan
Gordon H. Williams United States
Graeme Eisenhofer United States
Annadora J. Bruce‐Keller United States
Robert M. Cohen United States
Mika Scheinin Finland
Peter de Boer relative to Daniel T. O’Connor United States Daniel T. O’Connor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Daniel T. O’Connor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter de Boer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter de Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter de Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter de Boer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter de Boer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter de Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter de Boer. The network helps show where Peter de Boer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter de Boer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter de Boer Line = papers co-authored together Peter de Boer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202336
2 202044
3 201845
4 201816
5 201617
6 201648
7 201542
8 201334
9 201166
10 200819
11 200642
12 200422
13 200230
14 200124
15 199634
16 199430
17 19927
18 19827
19
Workshop on chromosomal aspects of male sterility in mammals, summary and synthesis
198018
20
"Outpatient hyperkalemia" syndrome in renal and hypertensive patients with suppressed aldosterone production.
19793

About Peter de Boer

Peter de Boer is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience, Nephrology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 209 papers that have together received 7.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (27 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (27 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (20 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (18 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (18 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (18 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (15 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (934 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (511 citations), Nephrology (714 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (409 citations). Peter de Boer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include E. J. Dorhout Mees, Hein A. Koomans, Ton J. Rabelink, G. G. Geyskes, Wayne C. Drevets, Branko Braam, Jan C. Roos, Ronald J. Hené, Ben H.C. Westerink and H. A. Koomans. Their work appears in journals such as Kidney International, European Journal of Pharmacology, Hypertension, Journal of Psychopharmacology and ˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026