Vincent D. Costa
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bruno B. AverbeckPeter J. LangMargaret M. BradleyDean SabatinelliFrancesco VersaceJanita TurchiElisabeth A. MurrayOlga Dal Monte
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (14 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaFrance
In The Last Decade
Vincent D. Costa
48 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 454
- Social Psychology 348
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 298
- Psychiatry and Mental health 152
Countries citing papers authored by Vincent D. Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Vincent D. Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vincent D. Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vincent D. Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vincent D. Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vincent D. Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vincent D. Costa. The network helps show where Vincent D. Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vincent D. Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vincent D. Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vincent D. Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vincent D. Costa. Vincent D. Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 76 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 127 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Vincent D. Costa
Vincent D. Costa is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Sensory Systems, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (25 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (14 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), General Decision Sciences (81 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (454 citations). Vincent D. Costa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and France. Frequent co-authors include Bruno B. Averbeck, Peter J. Lang, Margaret M. Bradley, Dean Sabatinelli, Francesco Versace, Janita Turchi, Elisabeth A. Murray, Olga Dal Monte, Andreas Keil and R. Becket Ebitz. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.