Countries citing papers authored by Vicente Ponsoda
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Vicente Ponsoda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vicente Ponsoda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vicente Ponsoda more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vicente Ponsoda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vicente Ponsoda. The network helps show where Vicente Ponsoda may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vicente Ponsoda
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vicente Ponsoda.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vicente Ponsoda based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Vicente Ponsoda. Vicente Ponsoda is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hernández, Ana, et al.. (2016). REVISIÓN DEL MODELO PARA EVALUAR LA CALIDAD DE LOS TESTS UTILIZADOS EN ESPAÑA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.15 indexed citations
2.
Hernández, Ana, Vicente Ponsoda, José Muñiz, Gerardo Prieto, & Paula Elosua. (2016). ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF TESTS IN SPAIN: REVISION OF THE SPANISH TEST REVIEW MODEL. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
3.
Muñiz, José, Ana Hernández, & Vicente Ponsoda. (2015). NEW GUIDELINES FOR TEST USE: RESEARCH, QUALITY CONTROL AND SECURITY OF TESTS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
4.
Muñiz, José, Ana Hernández, & Vicente Ponsoda. (2015). NUEVAS DIRECTRICES SOBRE EL USO DE LOS TESTS: INVESTIGACIÓN, CONTROL DE CALIDAD Y SEGURIDAD. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.11 indexed citations
5.
Ponsoda, Vicente & Pedro M. Hontangas. (2013). SEGUNDA EVALUACIÓN DE TESTS EDITADOS EN ESPAÑA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
Abad, Francisco J., Julio Olea, & Vicente Ponsoda. (2009). The Multiple-Choice Model. Applied Psychological Measurement. 33(3). 200–221.5 indexed citations
11.
Olea, Julio, Francisco J. Abad, Vicente Ponsoda, & Carmen Ximénez. (2004). Un test adaptativo informatizado para evaluar el conocimiento de inglés escrito: diseño y comprobaciones psicométricas. Psicothema. 16(3). 519–525.23 indexed citations
12.
Abad, Francisco J., Julio Olea, & Vicente Ponsoda. (2001). Analysis of the optimum number alternatives from the Item Response Theory. Psicothema. 13(1). 152–158.17 indexed citations
13.
Ponsoda, Vicente, et al.. (2000). Scanning Ads: Effects of Involvement and of Position of the Illustration in Printed Advertisements. ACR North American Advances.13 indexed citations
14.
Ponsoda, Vicente. (2000). Overview of the computerized adaptive testing special section.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.3 indexed citations
Revuelta, Javier & Vicente Ponsoda. (1998). UN TEST ADAPTATIVO INFORMATIZADO DE ANÁLISIS LÓGICO BASADO EN LA GENERACIÓN AUTOMÁTICA DE ÍTEMS. Psicothema. 10(3). 709–716.8 indexed citations
18.
Olea, Julio & Vicente Ponsoda. (1998). Tests informatizados y adaptativos informatizados: investigación en España. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
Olea, Julio, et al.. (1996). MEASURING INVOLVEMENT FROM ITS CONSEQUENCES. Psicothema. 8(2). 337–349.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.