Vesna Gagić
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 20
- Insect and Pesticide Research 12
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 3
-
- Plant and animal studies 28
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 7
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 10
-
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 3
-
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Riccardo BommarcoTeja TscharntkeNancy A. SchellhornÍgnasi BartomeusCarsten ThiesWolfgang W. WeisserCamilla WinqvistMark Emmerson
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape Conservation
In The Last Decade
Vesna Gagić
33 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Insect Science 1.0k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 575
- Ecological Modeling 174
- Plant Science 679
Countries citing papers authored by Vesna Gagić
This map shows the geographic impact of Vesna Gagić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vesna Gagić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vesna Gagić more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vesna Gagić
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vesna Gagić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vesna Gagić. The network helps show where Vesna Gagić may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vesna Gagić, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 86 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 129 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 13 | Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indicesbreakdown → | 2015 | 513 |
| 14 | 2015 | 205 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 82 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 153 |
About Vesna Gagić
Vesna Gagić is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (20 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (575 citations). Vesna Gagić has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Riccardo Bommarco, Teja Tscharntke, Nancy A. Schellhorn, Ígnasi Bartomeus, Carsten Thies, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Camilla Winqvist, Mark Emmerson, Simon G. Potts and Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.