Véronique Planchamp

918 total citations
7 papers, 731 citations indexed

About

Véronique Planchamp is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Véronique Planchamp has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 731 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Developmental Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Véronique Planchamp's work include Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers) and Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (1 paper). Véronique Planchamp is often cited by papers focused on Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers) and Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (1 paper). Véronique Planchamp collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Véronique Planchamp's co-authors include Mathias Bähr, Paul Lingor, Lars Tönges, Christina Bermel, Elisabeth Barski, Thomas Ostendorf, N. Pieper, Jan Christoph Koch, Uwe Michel and Christine Stadelmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Brain and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Véronique Planchamp

7 papers receiving 724 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Véronique Planchamp Germany 7 369 283 132 114 108 7 731
David Eveleth United States 14 430 1.2× 231 0.8× 38 0.3× 39 0.3× 35 0.3× 27 800
Arundhati Sengupta Ghosh United States 9 319 0.9× 222 0.8× 71 0.5× 14 0.1× 25 0.2× 10 532
Camille Brochier United States 11 1.0k 2.8× 207 0.7× 50 0.4× 10 0.1× 58 0.5× 14 1.2k
Jens Kopatz Germany 12 329 0.9× 74 0.3× 34 0.3× 58 0.5× 26 0.2× 12 768
Ronald E. Hurd United States 7 892 2.4× 288 1.0× 29 0.2× 254 2.2× 63 0.6× 8 1.1k
Mariyam Murtaza Australia 13 317 0.9× 131 0.5× 76 0.6× 25 0.2× 36 0.3× 20 547
Andre Fortin Canada 6 713 1.9× 124 0.4× 51 0.4× 14 0.1× 93 0.9× 6 920
Simon Ngamli Fewou Germany 13 319 0.9× 169 0.6× 98 0.7× 5 0.0× 33 0.3× 21 598
Zhengxin Ying China 12 252 0.7× 146 0.5× 36 0.3× 8 0.1× 51 0.5× 19 440
Erkki Kuusisto Finland 13 547 1.5× 194 0.7× 13 0.1× 135 1.2× 456 4.2× 16 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Véronique Planchamp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Véronique Planchamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Véronique Planchamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Véronique Planchamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Véronique Planchamp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Véronique Planchamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Véronique Planchamp. The network helps show where Véronique Planchamp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Véronique Planchamp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Véronique Planchamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Véronique Planchamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Véronique Planchamp. Véronique Planchamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Tönges, Lars, Véronique Planchamp, Jan Christoph Koch, et al.. (2011). JNK Isoforms Differentially Regulate Neurite Growth and Regeneration in Dopaminergic Neurons In Vitro. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 45(2). 284–293. 24 indexed citations
2.
Knöferle, Johanna, Jan Christoph Koch, Thomas Ostendorf, et al.. (2010). Mechanisms of acute axonal degeneration in the optic nerve in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107(13). 6064–6069. 230 indexed citations
3.
Bermel, Christina, Lars Tönges, Véronique Planchamp, et al.. (2009). Combined inhibition of Cdk5 and ROCK additively increase cell survival, but not the regenerative response in regenerating retinal ganglion cells. Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience. 42(4). 427–437. 26 indexed citations
4.
Planchamp, Véronique, Christina Bermel, Lars Tönges, et al.. (2008). BAG1 promotes axonal outgrowth and regeneration in vivo via Raf-1 and reduction of ROCK activity. Brain. 131(10). 2606–2619. 63 indexed citations
5.
Meuer, Katrin, Ida Suppanz, Paul Lingor, et al.. (2007). Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 is an upstream regulator of mitochondrial fission during neuronal apoptosis. Cell Death and Differentiation. 14(4). 651–661. 93 indexed citations
6.
Lingor, Paul, Lars Tönges, N. Pieper, et al.. (2007). ROCK inhibition and CNTF interact on intrinsic signalling pathways and differentially regulate survival and regeneration in retinal ganglion cells. Brain. 131(1). 250–263. 199 indexed citations
7.
Pietrancosta, Nicolas, Anice Moumen, Rosanna Dono, et al.. (2006). Imino-tetrahydro-benzothiazole Derivatives as p53 Inhibitors:  Discovery of a Highly Potent in Vivo Inhibitor and Its Action Mechanism. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 49(12). 3645–3652. 96 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026