Vera Tudyka
About
In The Last Decade
Vera Tudyka
8 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Oncology 274
- Surgery 166
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 126
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 45
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 39
Countries citing papers authored by Vera Tudyka
This map shows the geographic impact of Vera Tudyka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vera Tudyka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vera Tudyka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vera Tudyka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vera Tudyka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vera Tudyka. The network helps show where Vera Tudyka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vera Tudyka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vera Tudyka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vera Tudyka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vera Tudyka. Vera Tudyka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 153 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | Surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis. | 45 |
| 10 | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.