Annabel Shaw

416 total citations
13 papers, 260 citations indexed

About

Annabel Shaw is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Annabel Shaw has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 260 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Oncology, 6 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Annabel Shaw's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers) and Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (3 papers). Annabel Shaw is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers) and Vacuum and Plasma Arcs (3 papers). Annabel Shaw collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Netherlands. Annabel Shaw's co-authors include Nigel D’Souza, Gina Brown, Amy Lord, Muti Abulafi, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Brendan Moran, Alison Corr, Ian Chau, Anuradha Chandramohan and D. Whittaker and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Annals of Surgery and Cancer Treatment Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Annabel Shaw

13 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annabel Shaw United Kingdom 8 191 112 93 55 24 13 260
Barbara Cannillo Italy 11 84 0.4× 95 0.8× 267 2.9× 133 2.4× 19 0.8× 22 461
Andrea Scacchi Italy 9 92 0.5× 111 1.0× 64 0.7× 67 1.2× 7 0.3× 16 228
David J. Gilderdale United Kingdom 9 33 0.2× 172 1.5× 94 1.0× 39 0.7× 10 0.4× 10 278
Toshiaki Wada Japan 8 252 1.3× 271 2.4× 40 0.4× 97 1.8× 5 0.2× 23 429
Sean Cavanaugh United States 9 93 0.5× 59 0.5× 140 1.5× 189 3.4× 66 2.8× 19 392
Franziska Fritz Germany 10 102 0.5× 107 1.0× 213 2.3× 49 0.9× 8 0.3× 13 339
Francis W. Cutruzzola United States 6 39 0.2× 108 1.0× 132 1.4× 191 3.5× 12 0.5× 7 358
Keelan Byrne Australia 10 80 0.4× 33 0.3× 130 1.4× 257 4.7× 54 2.3× 15 366
Kensuke Fujii Japan 10 67 0.4× 121 1.1× 16 0.2× 51 0.9× 19 0.8× 49 304
Lawrence H. Lanzl United States 8 40 0.2× 15 0.1× 59 0.6× 82 1.5× 15 0.6× 38 255

Countries citing papers authored by Annabel Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabel Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabel Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabel Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabel Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabel Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabel Shaw. The network helps show where Annabel Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annabel Shaw

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annabel Shaw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annabel Shaw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annabel Shaw. Annabel Shaw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
2.
D’Souza, Nigel, Amy Lord, Annabel Shaw, et al.. (2020). The sigmoid take-off: An anatomical imaging definition of the rectum validated on specimen analysis. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 46(9). 1668–1672. 24 indexed citations
3.
Lord, Amy, Nigel D’Souza, Annabel Shaw, et al.. (2020). MRI-Diagnosed Tumor Deposits and EMVI Status Have Superior Prognostic Accuracy to Current Clinical TNM Staging in Rectal Cancer. Annals of Surgery. 276(2). 334–344. 120 indexed citations
4.
Lord, Amy, et al.. (2019). The Current Status of Nodal Staging in Rectal Cancer. Current Colorectal Cancer Reports. 15(5). 143–148. 9 indexed citations
5.
D’Souza, Nigel, Annabel Shaw, Amy Lord, et al.. (2019). Assessment of a Staging System for Sigmoid Colon Cancer Based on Tumor Deposits and Extramural Venous Invasion on Computed Tomography. JAMA Network Open. 2(12). e1916987–e1916987. 25 indexed citations
6.
D’Souza, Nigel, Amy Lord, Annabel Shaw, et al.. (2018). Meta-analysis of oncological outcomes of sigmoid cancers: A hidden epidemic of R1 “palliative” resections. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 45(4). 489–497. 1 indexed citations
7.
D’Souza, Nigel, Michael P.M. de Neree tot Babberich, Amy Lord, et al.. (2018). The rectosigmoid problem. Surgical Oncology. 27(3). 521–525. 23 indexed citations
8.
Padwick, Robert, et al.. (2013). The Two-Week Referral System for colorectal cancer—not fit for purpose. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 28(11). 1531–1534. 5 indexed citations
10.
Edels, H., D. Whittaker, Kenneth G. Evans, & Annabel Shaw. (1965). Experiments and theory on arc reignition by spark breakdown. Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers. 112(12). 2343–2343. 19 indexed citations
11.
Shaw, Annabel & D. Whittaker. (1964). Effect of gas flow on post-arc gap recovery. Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers. 111(1). 193–193. 11 indexed citations
12.
Edels, H., et al.. (1962). Convection-free Post-arc Gap Recovery. Nature. 193(4812). 263–264. 2 indexed citations
13.
Shaw, Annabel & John Fry. (1955). Acute Infections of the Chest in General Practice. BMJ. 2(4956). 1577–1586. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026