Venkata Atluri
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physiology top 5%
- Virology top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Neurology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Adriana YndartAjeet KaushikMadhavan NairSneham TiwariThangavel SamikkannuRahul Dev JayantVidya SagarKesava Rao Venkata Kurapati
- Topics
- HIV Research and Treatment (24 papers)Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (9 papers)Tryptophan and brain disorders (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaGermany
In The Last Decade
Venkata Atluri
55 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Molecular Biology 963
- Physiology 523
- Virology 455
- Biomedical Engineering 432
- Neurology 395
Countries citing papers authored by Venkata Atluri
This map shows the geographic impact of Venkata Atluri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Venkata Atluri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Venkata Atluri more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Venkata Atluri
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Venkata Atluri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Venkata Atluri. The network helps show where Venkata Atluri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Venkata Atluri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Venkata Atluri. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Venkata Atluri based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Venkata Atluri. Venkata Atluri is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | <p>Alzheimer’s disease: pathogenesis, diagnostics, and therapeutics</p>breakdown → | 897 |
| 3 | 78 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 80 | |
| 8 | 93 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 98 | |
| 12 | 62 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 84 | |
| 17 | Prevalence of induced clindamycin resistance in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus from hospital population of coastal Andhara pradesh, South india | 2 |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Venkata Atluri
Venkata Atluri is a scholar working on Virology, Biological Psychiatry and Neurology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV Research and Treatment (24 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (9 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (455 citations), Biological Psychiatry (192 citations) and Neurology (395 citations). Venkata Atluri has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Adriana Yndart, Ajeet Kaushik, Madhavan Nair, Madhavan Nair, Sneham Tiwari, Thangavel Samikkannu, Rahul Dev Jayant, Vidya Sagar, Kesava Rao Venkata Kurapati and Sudheesh Pilakka‐Kanthikeel. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Free Radical Biology and Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.