Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation
2019200 citationsVeiko Lember, Piret Tõnurist et al.Public Management Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Veiko Lember's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Veiko Lember with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veiko Lember more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Veiko Lember. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Veiko Lember. The network helps show where Veiko Lember may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Veiko Lember
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Veiko Lember.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Veiko Lember based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Veiko Lember. Veiko Lember is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wouters, Stijn, Veiko Lember, & Joep Crompvoets. (2021). Coordinating the digital transformation of inter-organizational public services – The case of e-invoicing in Belgium / Koordination der Digitalen Transformation organisationsübergreifender öffentlicher Dienstleistungen - Der Fall der elektronischen Rechnung in Belgien. 14(1).1 indexed citations
Tõnurist, Piret, Rainer Kattel, & Veiko Lember. (2017). Descobrindo laboratórios de inovação no setor público. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).1 indexed citations
Verhoest, Koen, et al.. (2015). Introducing the national context for PPPs: Elements and dimensions. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 9–18.2 indexed citations
11.
Lember, Veiko, Rainer Kattel, & Tarmo Kalvet. (2014). Public procurement, innovation and policy : international perspectives. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).27 indexed citations
12.
Karo, Erkki, et al.. (2014). Nutika spetsialiseerumise võimalused ja väljakutsed Eestis teadus-, arendus- ja innovatsioonipoliitika kujundamisel ja juhtimisel 2014-2020. DSpace repository (University of Tartu).2 indexed citations
Verhoest, Koen, et al.. (2013). Public private partnerships in transport : trends & theory, P3T3.9 indexed citations
15.
Carbonara, Nunzia, et al.. (2013). COST action TU1001 : Public private partnerships in transport : trends & theory P3T3 : 2013 discussion papers.2 indexed citations
16.
Lember, Veiko & Kenneth A. Kriz. (2010). PURCHASE-OF-SERVICE CONTRACTING IN ESTONIA. Lirias (KU Leuven). 11(2). 239–254.1 indexed citations
Lember, Veiko & Wolfgang Drechsler. (2009). Contracting-Out Public Services and Public Procurement for Innovation: Revisiting Contracting Limits in Estonia and Beyond.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.