Veerle Decaluwé
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Pharmacy top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Caroline BraetLien GoossensChristopher G. FairburnGuy BosmansKim Van DurmeEllen MoensLeen Van VlierbergheSandra Verbeken
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (11 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers)Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers)
- Journals
- Behaviour Research and TherapyInternational Journal of ObesityInternational Journal of Eating Disorders
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Veerle Decaluwé
12 papers receiving 690 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Clinical Psychology 671
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 501
- Pharmacy 170
- Psychiatry and Mental health 170
- Sociology and Political Science 77
Countries citing papers authored by Veerle Decaluwé
This map shows the geographic impact of Veerle Decaluwé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Veerle Decaluwé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Veerle Decaluwé more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Veerle Decaluwé
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Veerle Decaluwé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Veerle Decaluwé. The network helps show where Veerle Decaluwé may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Veerle Decaluwé
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Veerle Decaluwé. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Veerle Decaluwé based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Veerle Decaluwé. Veerle Decaluwé is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CoVaT-CHC Basisversie: Cognitieve vaardigheidstest volgens het CHC-model | 9 |
| 2 | 60 | |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 111 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 142 | |
| 11 | 122 | |
| 12 | 158 |
About Veerle Decaluwé
Veerle Decaluwé is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (11 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (10 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (170 citations), Clinical Psychology (671 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (501 citations). Veerle Decaluwé has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Braet, Lien Goossens, Christopher G. Fairburn, Guy Bosmans, Kim Van Durme, Ellen Moens, Leen Van Vlierberghe and Sandra Verbeken. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, International Journal of Obesity and International Journal of Eating Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.