Vedran Kardum
About
In The Last Decade
Vedran Kardum
3 papers receiving 542 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Molecular Biology 454
- Oncology 161
- Cancer Research 99
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 62
- Genetics 58
Countries citing papers authored by Vedran Kardum
This map shows the geographic impact of Vedran Kardum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vedran Kardum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vedran Kardum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vedran Kardum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vedran Kardum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vedran Kardum. The network helps show where Vedran Kardum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vedran Kardum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vedran Kardum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vedran Kardum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vedran Kardum. Vedran Kardum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | The role of the Hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer: A comprehensive review breakdown → | 529 |
| 4 | 0 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.