Vanja Perčulija

613 citations
10 papers · 356 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 4
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 3
    • RNA regulation and disease 2
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 1
    • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors 1

Vanja Perčulija

10 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Vanja Perčulija
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Business and International Management 14
  • Molecular Biology 243
  • Endocrinology 15
  • Ecology 77
  • Animal Science and Zoology 22
Replace Xu Feng with:
Xu Feng China
Feng Su China
Reidun Lillestøl United Kingdom
Sofia Medvedeva United States
Soley Gudbergsdottir Denmark
Lyam Baudry France
Michaël Dumas France
M. Michael Harden United States
Meng‐Ze Du China
Eyal Weinstock Israel
Vanja Perčulija relative to Xu Feng China Xu Feng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Xu Feng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vanja Perčulija

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vanja Perčulija's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanja Perčulija with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanja Perčulija more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vanja Perčulija

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vanja Perčulija. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vanja Perčulija. The network helps show where Vanja Perčulija may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vanja Perčulija, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vanja Perčulija Line = papers co-authored together Vanja Perčulija links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201976
2 201966
3 202149
4 202035
5 202032
6 202131
7 202224
8 202023
9 202018
10 20192

About Vanja Perčulija

Vanja Perčulija is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Plant Science, Infectious Diseases and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), RNA regulation and disease (2 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (1 paper), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper) and Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (14 citations), Molecular Biology (243 citations), Endocrinology (15 citations), Ecology (77 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (22 citations). Vanja Perčulija has collaborated with scholars based in China, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Songying Ouyang, Bo Zhang, Xinxian Wei, Guixiang Tong, Chunyan Peng, Bin Gong, Hongxin Guan, Yu Li, Siqi Wang and Jing Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Advanced Science, Journal of Virology, PLoS Biology and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact