Vanita Berry
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
- Genetics top 2%
- Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
- Ocular Disorders and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 10
- Genetics 15
- Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research 12
- Ocular Disorders and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Anthony T. MooreShomi S. BhattacharyaAlan ShielsDonna S. MackayAlexander IonidesPeter J. FrancisM. Ashwin ReddyRoy A. Quinlan
- Journals
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (4 papers)Eye (4 papers)Ophthalmic Genetics (4 papers)European Journal of Human Genetics (2 papers)Human Molecular Genetics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Vanita Berry
36 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Ophthalmology 480
- Genetics 716
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Sensory Systems 40
- Clinical Biochemistry 54
Countries citing papers authored by Vanita Berry
This map shows the geographic impact of Vanita Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanita Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanita Berry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vanita Berry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vanita Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vanita Berry. The network helps show where Vanita Berry may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vanita Berry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 9 | A CRYGD mutation is associated with familial coralliform cataract | 2004 | 0 |
| 10 | 2004 | 48 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 174 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 85 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 224 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 275 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 44 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 16 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1962 | 51 |
About Vanita Berry
Vanita Berry is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Immunology and Allergy and Sensory Systems, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (29 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (12 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (10 papers), RNA regulation and disease (5 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Trace Elements in Health (2 papers) and Bone health and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (480 citations), Genetics (716 citations), Molecular Biology (1.6k citations), Sensory Systems (40 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (54 citations). Vanita Berry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Anthony T. Moore, Shomi S. Bhattacharya, Alan Shiels, Donna S. Mackay, Alexander Ionides, Peter J. Francis, M. Ashwin Reddy, Roy A. Quinlan, Siladitya Bhattacharya and Zoha Kibar. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Human Genetics, Eye, Ophthalmic Genetics, European Journal of Human Genetics and Human Molecular Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.