Vanida Intarachot
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Surgery
- Toxicology top 5%
- Emergency Medicine
- Co-authors
- Koonlawee NademaneeBramah N. SinghMartin A. JosephsonFreny Vaghaiwalla ModyMargaret A.K. RyanDavid A. GorelickJeffrey WilkinsMichelle A. Josephson
- Topics
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers)Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Internal MedicineJournal of the American College of CardiologyThe American Journal of Cardiology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Vanida Intarachot
9 papers receiving 566 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 503
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 294
- Surgery 134
- Toxicology 64
- Emergency Medicine 34
Countries citing papers authored by Vanida Intarachot
This map shows the geographic impact of Vanida Intarachot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanida Intarachot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanida Intarachot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vanida Intarachot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vanida Intarachot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vanida Intarachot. The network helps show where Vanida Intarachot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vanida Intarachot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vanida Intarachot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vanida Intarachot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vanida Intarachot. Vanida Intarachot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 103 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 228 | |
| 6 | 97 | |
| 7 | 54 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 32 |
About Vanida Intarachot
Vanida Intarachot is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Toxicology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 9 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (503 citations), Toxicology (64 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (294 citations). Vanida Intarachot has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Koonlawee Nademanee, Bramah N. Singh, Martin A. Josephson, Freny Vaghaiwalla Mody, Margaret A.K. Ryan, David A. Gorelick, Jeffrey Wilkins, Michelle A. Josephson, H.A. Robertson and Pramil N. Singh. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and The American Journal of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.