Vandana Aspen
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- James LockAlison DarcyDenise E. WilfleyC. Barr TaylorAndrea E. KassMeghan M. SintonAnna VannucciJakki O. Bailey
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (14 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (8 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyBehaviour Research and TherapyPsychosomatic Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Vandana Aspen
13 papers receiving 415 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Clinical Psychology 385
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 105
- Sociology and Political Science 85
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 74
- Applied Psychology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Vandana Aspen
This map shows the geographic impact of Vandana Aspen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vandana Aspen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vandana Aspen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Vandana Aspen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vandana Aspen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vandana Aspen. The network helps show where Vandana Aspen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vandana Aspen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vandana Aspen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vandana Aspen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vandana Aspen. Vandana Aspen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 58 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | Patient Resistance in Eating Disorders | 4 |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 100 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 |
About Vandana Aspen
Vandana Aspen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (14 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (8 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (385 citations), Applied Psychology (67 citations) and Pharmacy (47 citations). Vandana Aspen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James Lock, Alison Darcy, Denise E. Wilfley, C. Barr Taylor, Andrea E. Kass, Meghan M. Sinton, Anna Vannucci, Jakki O. Bailey, Mickey Trockel and Corinna Jacobi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Psychosomatic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.