V. I. Umatov

4.3k total citations
46 papers, 684 citations indexed

About

V. I. Umatov is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, V. I. Umatov has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 684 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 19 papers in Radiation and 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in V. I. Umatov's work include Neutrino Physics Research (42 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (25 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (22 papers). V. I. Umatov is often cited by papers focused on Neutrino Physics Research (42 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (25 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (22 papers). V. I. Umatov collaborates with scholars based in Russia, France and Italy. V. I. Umatov's co-authors include A. S. Barabash, Ph. Hubert, F. Hubert, A. Nachab, С. И. Коновалов, R. Gurriarán, J. Suhonen, A. S. Barabash, L. De Braeckeleer and I.A. Vanyushin and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

V. I. Umatov

46 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
V. I. Umatov Russia 16 657 125 89 23 20 46 684
A. S. Barabash Russia 10 364 0.6× 82 0.7× 82 0.9× 18 0.8× 14 0.7× 46 404
F. Raiola Germany 8 191 0.3× 135 1.1× 119 1.3× 11 0.5× 13 0.7× 14 275
M. Fallot France 10 758 1.2× 107 0.9× 106 1.2× 31 1.3× 6 0.3× 31 793
E. F. Zganjar United States 10 344 0.5× 169 1.4× 170 1.9× 45 2.0× 6 0.3× 29 398
S. Q. Yan China 11 293 0.4× 98 0.8× 128 1.4× 29 1.3× 4 0.2× 40 331
L. Batist Russia 12 333 0.5× 140 1.1× 116 1.3× 23 1.0× 8 0.4× 17 371
H. Keller Germany 13 334 0.5× 126 1.0× 132 1.5× 19 0.8× 11 0.6× 31 355
Frank Calaprice United States 11 294 0.4× 70 0.6× 134 1.5× 37 1.6× 8 0.4× 25 351
R. Nouicer France 11 363 0.6× 96 0.8× 189 2.1× 25 1.1× 6 0.3× 20 398
P. Karvonen Finland 11 348 0.5× 153 1.2× 183 2.1× 47 2.0× 14 0.7× 27 393

Countries citing papers authored by V. I. Umatov

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. I. Umatov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. I. Umatov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. I. Umatov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. I. Umatov

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. I. Umatov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. I. Umatov. The network helps show where V. I. Umatov may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. I. Umatov

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. I. Umatov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. I. Umatov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with V. I. Umatov. V. I. Umatov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Polischuk, O. G., A. S. Barabash, P. Belli, et al.. (2021). Double beta decay of 150 Nd to the first 0 + excited level of 150 Sm. Physica Scripta. 96(8). 85302–85302. 6 indexed citations
2.
Barabash, A. S., V. Brudanin, А. А. Клименко, et al.. (2020). Improved limits on β+EC and ECEC processes in 74Se. Nuclear Physics A. 996. 121697–121697. 6 indexed citations
3.
Barabash, A. S., Ph. Hubert, A. Nachab, & V. I. Umatov. (2019). Search for triple and quadruple β decay of Nd150. Physical review. C. 100(4). 1 indexed citations
4.
Barabash, A. S., P. Belli, R. Bernabei, et al.. (2019). Study of double-β decay of 150Nd to the first 0+ excited level of 150Sm. AIP conference proceedings. 2165. 20014–20014. 4 indexed citations
5.
Barabash, A. S., P. Belli, R. Bernabei, et al.. (2016). Improvement of radiopurity level of enriched 116CdWO4 and ZnWO4 crystal scintillators by recrystallization. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 833. 77–81. 29 indexed citations
6.
Barabash, A. S., F.A. Danevich, A. Giuliani, et al.. (2016). First test of an enriched $$^{116}$$ 116 CdWO $$_4$$ 4 scintillating bolometer for neutrinoless double-beta-decay searches. The European Physical Journal C. 76(9). 7 indexed citations
7.
Barabash, A. S., R. Saakyan, & V. I. Umatov. (2016). On concentration of42Ar in liquid argon. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 718. 62004–62004. 3 indexed citations
8.
Barabash, A. S., R. Saakyan, & V. I. Umatov. (2016). On concentration of 42Ar in the Earth's atmosphere. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 839. 39–42. 4 indexed citations
9.
Barabash, A. S., Ph. Hubert, Ch. Marquet, et al.. (2011). Improved limits onβ+EC and ECEC processes inSn112. Physical Review C. 83(4). 14 indexed citations
10.
Barabash, A. S., Ph. Hubert, A. Nachab, С. И. Коновалов, & V. I. Umatov. (2009). Search forβ+EC and ECEC processes inSn112. Physical Review C. 80(3). 11 indexed citations
11.
Braeckeleer, L. De, et al.. (2001). Measurement of theββ-Decay Rate of100Moto the First Excited0+State of100Ru. Physical Review Letters. 86(16). 3510–3513. 32 indexed citations
12.
Barabash, A. S., G. Carugno, С. И. Коновалов, et al.. (2001). Double beta decay of 100Mo. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters. 74(11). 529–531. 13 indexed citations
13.
Barabash, A. S., et al.. (2001). Measurement of the betabeta-Decay Rate of 100Mo to the First Excited 0+ State of 100Ru. Physical Review Letters. 86(16). 3510–3. 23 indexed citations
14.
Braeckeleer, L. De, et al.. (2000). Measurement of the ββ-decay rate of 100Mo to the first excited 0+ state in 100Ru. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 63(7). 1214–1217. 5 indexed citations
15.
Barabash, A. S., G. Carugno, С. И. Коновалов, et al.. (1999). Investigation of double beta decay of 100 Mo with the liquid argon ionization chamber. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 62(12). 2044–2047. 4 indexed citations
16.
Barabash, A. S., R. Gurriarán, F. Hubert, Ph. Hubert, & V. I. Umatov. (1999). 2nubetabeta decay of 100 Mo to the first 0 + excited state in 100 Ru. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 62(12). 2039–2043. 20 indexed citations
17.
Barabash, A. S., G. Carugno, С. И. Коновалов, et al.. (1999). Search for double beta decay of 100Mo with liquid argon ionization chamber (first results). Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 70(1-3). 233–235. 6 indexed citations
18.
Barabash, A. S., G. Carugno, С. И. Коновалов, et al.. (1998). Study of double-beta decay of 100 Mo with liquid-argon ionization chamber (first results). Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 61(6). 910–914. 2 indexed citations
19.
Barabash, A. S., G. Carugno, С. И. Коновалов, et al.. (1998). New experimental limit on the 42Ar content in the Earth’s atmosphere. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 416(1). 179–181. 5 indexed citations
20.
Barabash, A. S., et al.. (1995). Search for?? decay of76Ge to the excited states in76Se. The European Physical Journal A. 352(2). 231–233. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026