V. Holford-Strevens
- Immunology and Allergy top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Immunology
- Dermatology top 5%
- Topics
- Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (13 papers)Immune Cell Function and Interaction (6 papers)T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
V. Holford-Strevens
27 papers receiving 583 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Immunology and Allergy 254
- Physiology 219
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 130
- Immunology 125
- Dermatology 102
Countries citing papers authored by V. Holford-Strevens
This map shows the geographic impact of V. Holford-Strevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Holford-Strevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Holford-Strevens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by V. Holford-Strevens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Holford-Strevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Holford-Strevens. The network helps show where V. Holford-Strevens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. Holford-Strevens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. Holford-Strevens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. Holford-Strevens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with V. Holford-Strevens. V. Holford-Strevens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Respiratory disorders among Canadian farmers. | 4 |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | Suppression of the anti-trimellityl (TM) IgE response in mice by conjugates of TM with polyvinyl alcohol. | 7 |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 94 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 147 | |
| 19 | 'False positive' precipitation reactions to extracts of organic dusts due to a teichoic acid from S. aureus. Techniques. | 32 |
| 20 | 10 |
About V. Holford-Strevens
V. Holford-Strevens is a scholar working on Immunology and Allergy, Immunology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 28 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (13 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (6 papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (254 citations), Dermatology (102 citations) and Physiology (219 citations). V. Holford-Strevens has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Pepys, Jure Manfreda, C P Warren, Leif Wide, B Stenius, A.H. Sehon, Carrie R. Wong, Patrick Warren, Cindy J. Wong and Chris Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The Journal of Immunology and Environmental Health Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.