V. D. Chamizo

1.4k total citations
59 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

V. D. Chamizo is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, V. D. Chamizo has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 27 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 19 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in V. D. Chamizo's work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (45 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (27 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (19 papers). V. D. Chamizo is often cited by papers focused on Memory and Neural Mechanisms (45 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (27 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (19 papers). V. D. Chamizo collaborates with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Italy. V. D. Chamizo's co-authors include N. J. Mackintosh, T. Rodrigo, J. Antonio Aznar-Casanova, Ian P. L. McLaren, John S. March, José Sánchez‐Moreno, Juan Pablo Sánchez, Angélica Torres‐Berrío, José Prados and Josep B. Trobalón and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Brain Research and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

V. D. Chamizo

56 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
V. D. Chamizo Spain 20 828 377 363 229 177 59 1.1k
Edward S. Redhead United Kingdom 20 557 0.7× 248 0.7× 135 0.4× 134 0.6× 204 1.2× 64 1.1k
T. Rodrigo Spain 16 385 0.5× 159 0.4× 148 0.4× 103 0.4× 322 1.8× 27 866
Thackery I. Brown United States 17 819 1.0× 157 0.4× 237 0.7× 57 0.2× 300 1.7× 35 1.0k
Peter M. Jones United Kingdom 10 402 0.5× 180 0.5× 130 0.4× 90 0.4× 75 0.4× 31 553
Pamela Banta Lavenex Switzerland 21 1.0k 1.2× 269 0.7× 173 0.5× 43 0.2× 521 2.9× 61 1.7k
Robert Biegler Norway 10 338 0.4× 110 0.3× 125 0.3× 85 0.4× 106 0.6× 21 593
Jasper Ward-Robinson United Kingdom 15 600 0.7× 178 0.5× 56 0.2× 112 0.5× 289 1.6× 40 673
Linda Hermer United States 7 501 0.6× 480 1.3× 600 1.7× 48 0.2× 51 0.3× 8 1.0k
Brett M. Gibson United States 16 342 0.4× 140 0.4× 77 0.2× 86 0.4× 125 0.7× 51 695
Jeremy P. Goodridge United States 12 1.1k 1.4× 58 0.2× 160 0.4× 340 1.5× 676 3.8× 13 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by V. D. Chamizo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. D. Chamizo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. D. Chamizo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. D. Chamizo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. D. Chamizo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. D. Chamizo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. D. Chamizo. The network helps show where V. D. Chamizo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. D. Chamizo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. D. Chamizo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. D. Chamizo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with V. D. Chamizo. V. D. Chamizo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Aguilar‐Latorre, Alejandra, et al.. (2022). Previous Experience Seems Crucial to Eliminate the Sex Gap in Geometry Learning When Solving a Navigation Task in Rats (Rattus norvegicus). Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 838407–838407. 2 indexed citations
3.
Chamizo, V. D., et al.. (2020). Geometry learning while navigating: The importance of task difficulty and sex differences.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition. 46(4). 470–483. 2 indexed citations
4.
Sánchez, Juan Pablo, et al.. (2017). Environmental enrichment in the absence of wheel running produces beneficial behavioural and anti-oxidative effects in rats. Behavioural Processes. 144. 66–71. 11 indexed citations
5.
Sánchez, Juan Pablo, et al.. (2015). Anti-oxidative effects produced by environmental enrichment in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of male and female rats. Brain Research. 1613. 120–129. 28 indexed citations
6.
Chamizo, V. D., et al.. (2014). Landmark vs. Geometry Learning: Explaining Female Rats' Selective Preference for a Landmark.. RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya). 35(1). 81–100. 10 indexed citations
7.
Chamizo, V. D., et al.. (2013). Do hormonal changes that appear at the onset of puberty determine the strategies used by female rats when solving a navigation task?. Hormones and Behavior. 64(1). 122–135. 16 indexed citations
8.
Aguilar, Raúl, et al.. (2012). Landmark learning in a navigation task is not affected by the female rats' estrus cycle. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9 indexed citations
9.
Chamizo, V. D., et al.. (2012). Generalization decrement and not overshadowing by associative competition among pairs of landmarks in a navigation task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 38(3). 255–265. 10 indexed citations
10.
Chamizo, V. D., et al.. (2011). Order effects after blocked preexposure to two compound flavors. Behavioural Processes. 88(2). 94–100. 2 indexed citations
11.
Chamizo, V. D., et al.. (2011). Overshadowing and blocking between landmark learning and shape learning: the importance of sex differences. Learning & Behavior. 39(4). 324–335. 31 indexed citations
12.
Torres‐Berrío, Angélica, et al.. (2010). Sex differences in the strategies used by rats to solve a navigation task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 36(3). 395–401. 43 indexed citations
13.
Krug, Isabel, et al.. (2009). Is contextual-potentiated eating dependent on caloric density of food?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
14.
Vidal, José & V. D. Chamizo. (2008). Taste-Aversion Conditioning, But Not Immunosuppression Conditioning, Occurs Under Partial Water Deprivation. The Journal of General Psychology. 136(1). 71–90. 2 indexed citations
15.
Blanco, Eduardo, Juan José Villalaín Santamaría, V. D. Chamizo, & T. Rodrigo. (2006). Area and peak shift effects in a navigation task with rats. Revista internacional de psicología y terapia psicológica. 6(3). 313–330. 3 indexed citations
16.
Chamizo, V. D., et al.. (2006). The influence of landmark salience in a navigation task: An additive effect between its components.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes. 32(3). 339–344. 24 indexed citations
17.
Chamizo, V. D., T. Rodrigo, & N. J. Mackintosh. (2006). Spatial integration with rats. Learning & Behavior. 34(4). 348–354. 24 indexed citations
18.
Chamizo, V. D., et al.. (2005). Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: The role of proximity to the goal. Behavioural Processes. 71(1). 59–65. 36 indexed citations
19.
Chamizo, V. D.. (2002). Spatial Learning: Conditions and Basic Effects. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 23(1). 33–58. 20 indexed citations
20.
Mackintosh, N. J., et al.. (1996). Aprendizaje perceptivo en discriminaciones espaciales. Psicologica. 17(2). 279–296. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026