Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
On anomalous electroweak baryon-number non-conservation in the early universe
19851.9k citationsV.A. Kuzmin, V. A. Rubakov et al.Physics Letters Bprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of V. A. Rubakov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. A. Rubakov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. A. Rubakov more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. A. Rubakov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. A. Rubakov. The network helps show where V. A. Rubakov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of V. A. Rubakov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V. A. Rubakov.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V. A. Rubakov based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with V. A. Rubakov. V. A. Rubakov is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rubakov, V. A., et al.. (2019). Genesis beyond Horndeski with GR asymptotics. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Brihaye, Yves, D.Yu. Grigoriev, V. A. Rubakov, & D. H. Tchrakian. (2003). Extended model for monopole catalysis of nucleon decay. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 67(3).6 indexed citations
Rubakov, V. A.. (1997). Grand unification and heavy axion. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters. 65(8). 621–624.123 indexed citations
Rubakov, V. A.. (1990). Cosmology and astroparticle physics. 309–318.
9.
Rubakov, V. A. & V. P. Spiridonov. (1988). PARASUPERSYMMETRIC QUANTUM MECHANICS. Modern Physics Letters A. 3(14). 1337–1347.122 indexed citations
10.
Lavrelashvili, George, V. A. Rubakov, & P. Tinyakov. (1987). Disruption of Quantum Coherence upon a Change in Spatial Topology in Quantum Gravity. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 46. 167–169.92 indexed citations
Lavrelashvili, George, et al.. (1987). Particle Creation and Destruction of Quantum Coherence by Topological Change. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 139.1 indexed citations
Rubakov, V. A., et al.. (1986). Formation of a Yang-Mills crystal in the electroweak theory at high fermion densities. 44. 301–303.3 indexed citations
15.
Kuzmin, V.A., V. A. Rubakov, & Mikhail Shaposhnikov. (1985). On anomalous electroweak baryon-number non-conservation in the early universe. Physics Letters B. 155(1-2). 36–42.1917 indexed citations breakdown →
Rubakov, V. A., et al.. (1979). CANONICAL QUANTIZATION OF GRAVITY AND QUANTUM FIELD THEORY IN CURVED SPACE-TIME. Acta Physica Polonica B. 10. 1041–1048.36 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.