Ute Kryger

16 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Ute Kryger
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Paleontology 71
  • Insect Science 90
  • Small Animals 53
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 87
  • Ecology 160
Replace Shaun A. Forgie with:
Shaun A. Forgie New Zealand
Paul Manning Canada
A. Macqueen Australia
Stephen A. Hutton Ireland
Raquel L. Carvalho Brazil
Paul K. Lago United States
Robert Wallis United States
Luis A. Tarango-Arámbula Mexico
César M. A. Correa Brazil
Antônio José Creão-Duarte Brazil
Ute Kryger relative to Shaun A. Forgie New Zealand Shaun A. Forgie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Shaun A. Forgie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Kryger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Kryger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Kryger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Kryger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Kryger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Kryger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Kryger. The network helps show where Ute Kryger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ute Kryger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Kryger Line = papers co-authored together Ute Kryger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Scarabaeine dung beetles as indicators of biodiversity, habitat transformation and pest control chemicals in agro-ecosystems
200457
2 200746
3 200429
4 200028
5 201027
6 200624
7 200224
8 201023
9
Biology and ecology of Circellium bacchus (Fabricius 1781) (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae), a South African dung beetle of conservation concern
200620
10 200619
11 200914
12 200414
13 200610
14 20069
15 20067
16 20091

About Ute Kryger

Ute Kryger is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics, Plant Science and Paleontology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers), Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (3 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (3 papers) and Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (71 citations), Insect Science (90 citations), Small Animals (53 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (87 citations) and Ecology (160 citations). Ute Kryger has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Tunisia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Clarke H. Scholtz, Adrian L. V. Davis, Paulette Bloomer, Terence J. Robinson, Franz Suchentrunk, Hichem Ben Slimen, Hakan Sert, Paulo C. Alves, Amel Ben Ammar Elgaaïed and Per Kryger. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Entomological Research, Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research, South African Journal of Science, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact