Uta‐Renate Blumenthal
- Classics top 2%
- History top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science
- Religious studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey RichardsThomas F. X. NobleH. E. J. CowdreyRichard KayKenneth PenningtonTimothy ReuterConstance B. BouchardBernhard Bischoff
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (12 papers)Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (11 papers)Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryReligious studies
In The Last Decade
Uta‐Renate Blumenthal
19 papers receiving 61 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Classics 64
- History 62
- Political Science and International Relations 21
- Sociology and Political Science 13
- Religious studies 13
Countries citing papers authored by Uta‐Renate Blumenthal
This map shows the geographic impact of Uta‐Renate Blumenthal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uta‐Renate Blumenthal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uta‐Renate Blumenthal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Uta‐Renate Blumenthal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uta‐Renate Blumenthal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uta‐Renate Blumenthal. The network helps show where Uta‐Renate Blumenthal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Uta‐Renate Blumenthal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Uta‐Renate Blumenthal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Uta‐Renate Blumenthal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Uta‐Renate Blumenthal. Uta‐Renate Blumenthal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Canon Law, Religion, and Politics: "Liber Amicorum" Robert Somerville | 6 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Proceedings of the twelfth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law : Washington, D.C. 1-7 August 2004 | 2 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Gregor VII. : Papst zwischen Canossa und Kirchenreform | 4 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | Bemerkungen zum Register Papst Paschalis' II. | 1 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Carolingian essays : Andrew W. Mellon lectures in early Christian studies | 7 |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Uta‐Renate Blumenthal
Uta‐Renate Blumenthal is a scholar working on Classics, History and Religious studies, having authored 25 papers that have together received 92 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (12 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (11 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (64 citations), History (62 citations) and Religious studies (13 citations). Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Richards, Thomas F. X. Noble, H. E. J. Cowdrey, Richard Kay, Kenneth Pennington, Timothy Reuter, Constance B. Bouchard, Bernhard Bischoff and Karl Leyser. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, History of Education Quarterly and Speculum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.