Ursula Appl

419 total citations
8 papers, 98 citations indexed

About

Ursula Appl is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Ursula Appl has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 98 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3 papers in Surgery and 1 paper in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Recurrent topics in Ursula Appl's work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (7 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers). Ursula Appl is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (7 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers). Ursula Appl collaborates with scholars based in France, Netherlands and Spain. Ursula Appl's co-authors include Kenneth M. Steín, Jean‐Claude Deharo, Andrea M. Russo, Martin C. Burke, Craig Barr, Johan D. Aasbo, Jay Dinerman, Maria Grazia Bongiorni, Pier D. Lambiase and Nathan Carter and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology and American Heart Journal.

In The Last Decade

Ursula Appl

7 papers receiving 96 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ursula Appl France	5	91	11	7	7	5	8	98
Juxiang Li China	6	77 0.8×	18 1.6×	3 0.4×	9 1.3×	6 1.2×	15	100
Eric R. Williams United States	4	65 0.7×	12 1.1×	4 0.6×	5 0.7×	12 2.4×	6	83
Raimondo Massaro Italy	4	134 1.5×	12 1.1×	6 0.9×	22 3.1×	7 1.4×	10	145
Juraj Melichercik Germany	5	121 1.3×	9 0.8×	2 0.3×	4 0.6×	4 0.8×	15	130
Salvatore Ivan Caico Italy	7	87 1.0×	19 1.7×	2 0.3×	7 1.0×	5 1.0×	21	106
Cicely Dye United States	5	115 1.3×	13 1.2×	3 0.4×	24 3.4×	4 0.8×	16	122
Robert A. Pickett United States	6	53 0.6×	18 1.6×	3 0.4×	2 0.3×	4 0.8×	10	63
M. Glikson Israel	5	85 0.9×	14 1.3×	4 0.6×	17 2.4×		6	85
Valentin Meillet France	4	242 2.7×	5 0.5×	5 0.7×	6 0.9×	4 0.8×	6	250
Pierre Jais France	3	193 2.1×	41 3.7×	4 0.6×	22 3.1×	5 1.0×	3	195

Countries citing papers authored by Ursula Appl

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ursula Appl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ursula Appl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ursula Appl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ursula Appl

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ursula Appl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ursula Appl. The network helps show where Ursula Appl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ursula Appl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ursula Appl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ursula Appl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ursula Appl. Ursula Appl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Neuzner, Jörg, Stefan H. Hohnloser, Valentina Kutyifa, et al.. (2019). Effectiveness of single‐ vs dual‐coil implantable defibrillator leads: An observational analysis from the SIMPLE study. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 30(7). 1078–1085. 4 indexed citations

Boersma, Lucas V.A., Mikhael F. El‐Chami, Maria Grazia Bongiorni, et al.. (2019). Understanding Outcomes with the EMBLEM S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients with Low EF Study (UNTOUCHED): Clinical characteristics and perioperative results. Heart Rhythm. 16(11). 1636–1644. 45 indexed citations

Sandhu, Roopinder K., Yan Yun Liu, Michael Glikson, et al.. (2018). Sedation strategies for defibrillation threshold testing: safety outcomes with anaesthesiologist compared to proceduralist-directed sedation: an analysis from the SIMPLE study. EP Europace. 20(11). 1798–1803.

Amit, Guy, Jia Wang, Stuart J. Connolly, et al.. (2016). Apical versus Non‐Apical Lead: Is ICD Lead Position Important for Successful Defibrillation?. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 27(5). 581–586. 8 indexed citations

Healey, Jeff S., Stefan H. Hohnloser, Michael Glikson, et al.. (2012). The rationale and design of the Shockless IMPLant Evaluation (SIMPLE) trial: A randomized, controlled trial of defibrillation testing at the time of defibrillator implantation. American Heart Journal. 164(2). 146–152. 17 indexed citations

Marijon, Éloi, Sophie Jacob, Elisabeth Mouton, et al.. (2010). Frequency of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Patients Treated by Cardiac Resynchronization (from the Prospective, Multicenter Mona Lisa Study). The American Journal of Cardiology. 106(5). 688–693. 15 indexed citations

Saoudi, Nadir, et al.. (1999). How smart should pacemakers be?. The American Journal of Cardiology. 83(5). 180–186. 8 indexed citations

Nägele, Herbert, et al.. (1998). Implications of long-term pacemaker holter monitoring of patients with terminal heart failure submitted for heart transplantation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 31. 388–388. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact