Urs Zimmerli
About
In The Last Decade
Urs Zimmerli
5 papers receiving 398 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 196
- Materials Chemistry 154
- Biomedical Engineering 126
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 85
- Organic Chemistry 62
Countries citing papers authored by Urs Zimmerli
This map shows the geographic impact of Urs Zimmerli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Urs Zimmerli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Urs Zimmerli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Urs Zimmerli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Urs Zimmerli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Urs Zimmerli. The network helps show where Urs Zimmerli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Urs Zimmerli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Urs Zimmerli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Urs Zimmerli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Urs Zimmerli. Urs Zimmerli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 85 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 259 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.