Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
On the Water−Carbon Interaction for Use in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Graphite and Carbon Nanotubes
20031.1k citationsT. Werder, Jens Honoré Walther et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jens Honoré Walther
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Honoré Walther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Honoré Walther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Honoré Walther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Honoré Walther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Honoré Walther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Honoré Walther. The network helps show where Jens Honoré Walther may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Honoré Walther
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Honoré Walther.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Honoré Walther based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Honoré Walther. Jens Honoré Walther is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Walther, Jens Honoré, et al.. (2017). The collapse of Tacoma Narrows Bridge: a piece to the puzzle. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.1 indexed citations
13.
Winckelmans, Grégoire, et al.. (2017). Non-singular Green's functions for the unbounded Poisson equation in 2D and 3D derived using spectral cut-off regularization. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
14.
Nielsen, Lasse Tor, et al.. (2017). Hydrodynamics of microbial filter feeding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(35). 9373–9378.45 indexed citations
15.
Meyer, Knud Erik, et al.. (2012). Swirling flow in model of large two-stroke diesel engine. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.3 indexed citations
16.
Haider, Sajjad, et al.. (2010). INFLUENCE OF PISTON DISPLACEMENT ON THE SCAVENGING AND SWIRLING FLOW IN TWO-STROKE DIESEL ENGINES. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).2 indexed citations
17.
Schnipper, Teis, Anders Andersen, Tomas Bohr, & Jens Honoré Walther. (2009). Fluid Forces and Vortex Wakes of a Flapping Foil. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 62.1 indexed citations
18.
Koumoutsakos, Petros, et al.. (2003). Water-Carbon Interactions: Potential Energy Calibration Using Experimental Data. TechConnect Briefs. 3(2003). 546–548.7 indexed citations
19.
Koumoutsakos, Petros, et al.. (2003). On the Validity of the No-Slip Condition in Nanofluidics. TechConnect Briefs. 1(2003). 148–151.5 indexed citations
20.
Koumoutsakos, Petros, Jens Honoré Walther, & T. Werder. (2002). Hydrodynamics of Carbon Nanotubes Contact Angle and Hydrophobic Hydration. TechConnect Briefs. 2(2002). 490–493.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.