Una Adderley

973 total citations
33 papers, 626 citations indexed

About

Una Adderley is a scholar working on Surgery, Rehabilitation and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Una Adderley has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 626 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Surgery, 13 papers in Rehabilitation and 10 papers in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Una Adderley's work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (20 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (13 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (10 papers). Una Adderley is often cited by papers focused on Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (20 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (13 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (10 papers). Una Adderley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Una Adderley's co-authors include Carl Thompson, Jo C Dumville, Nikki Stubbs, Rebecca L Ashby, Nicky Cullum, Rhian Gabe, Martin Bland, Arthur R Kang’ombe, David Torgerson and Marta Soares and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Una Adderley

30 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Una Adderley United Kingdom 12 426 275 220 188 85 33 626
Michelle Gibb Australia 11 305 0.7× 245 0.9× 223 1.0× 80 0.4× 130 1.5× 20 485
Debra Doherty United Kingdom 12 694 1.6× 240 0.9× 239 1.1× 139 0.7× 93 1.1× 15 985
Graham W Fuller United Kingdom 9 389 0.9× 447 1.6× 360 1.6× 76 0.4× 233 2.7× 12 728
Nathan B. Parsons United States 8 253 0.6× 517 1.9× 294 1.3× 83 0.4× 432 5.1× 16 810
Maria T. Szewczyk Poland 14 272 0.6× 148 0.5× 111 0.5× 86 0.5× 74 0.9× 91 441
Sidnei Lastória Brazil 8 627 1.5× 203 0.7× 153 0.7× 421 2.2× 87 1.0× 26 784
Sheldon United Kingdom 7 202 0.5× 236 0.9× 150 0.7× 17 0.1× 92 1.1× 9 542
Eline Lima Borges Brazil 12 226 0.5× 119 0.4× 161 0.7× 30 0.2× 60 0.7× 75 464
Ruth Bryant United States 12 216 0.5× 267 1.0× 285 1.3× 17 0.1× 144 1.7× 43 593
Simon Barrett United Kingdom 12 314 0.7× 279 1.0× 167 0.8× 24 0.1× 87 1.0× 28 525

Countries citing papers authored by Una Adderley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Una Adderley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Una Adderley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Una Adderley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Una Adderley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Una Adderley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Una Adderley. The network helps show where Una Adderley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Una Adderley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Una Adderley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Una Adderley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Una Adderley. Una Adderley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nelson, E Andrea, Susan O’Meara, Georgina Gethin, et al.. (2024). Development of a core outcome set for use in research evaluations of interventions for venous leg ulceration: International eDelphi consensus. Journal of Tissue Viability. 33(2). 324–331.
2.
Nelson, E Andrea, Susan O’Meara, Una Adderley, et al.. (2021). Development of a core outcome set for venous leg ulceration (CoreVen) research evaluations (protocol). Journal of Tissue Viability. 30(3). 317–323. 2 indexed citations
3.
Adderley, Una. (2021). Creating capacity in the healthcare system: the urgent need to improve lower limb ulcer care. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 27(5). 112–114. 1 indexed citations
4.
Oates, Angela & Una Adderley. (2019). Survey of registered nurses’ selection of compression systems for the treatment of venous leg ulcers in the UK. Journal of Tissue Viability. 28(2). 115–119. 11 indexed citations
5.
Coleman, Susanne, E Andrea Nelson, Peter Vowden, et al.. (2017). Development of a generic wound care assessment minimum data set. Journal of Tissue Viability. 26(4). 226–240. 40 indexed citations
6.
Adderley, Una & Carl Thompson. (2017). Confidence and clinical judgement in community nurses managing venous leg ulceration – A judgement analysis. Journal of Tissue Viability. 26(4). 271–276. 11 indexed citations
7.
Adderley, Una, et al.. (2017). Reducing unwarranted variation in chronic wound care. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 2 indexed citations
8.
Backhouse, Michael, et al.. (2016). A qualitative study of factors impacting upon the recruitment of participants to research studies in wound care – The community nurses' perspective. Journal of Tissue Viability. 25(3). 185–188. 12 indexed citations
9.
Adderley, Una & Carl Thompson. (2015). A comparison of the management of venous leg ulceration by specialist and generalist community nurses: A judgement analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 53. 134–143. 14 indexed citations
10.
Bland, Martin, Jo C Dumville, Rebecca L Ashby, et al.. (2015). Validation of the VEINES-QOL quality of life instrument in venous leg ulcers: repeatability and validity study embedded in a randomised clinical trial. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 15(1). 85–85. 47 indexed citations
11.
Adderley, Una & Nikki Stubbs. (2014). Stockings or bandages for leg-ulcer compression?. PubMed. 110(15). 19–20. 5 indexed citations
12.
Gabe, Rhian, et al.. (2014). Compression hosiery versus compression bandages in treatment of venous leg ulcers (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV, VenUS IV): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2 indexed citations
13.
Adderley, Una & Carl Thompson. (2014). Community nurses’ judgement for the management of venous leg ulceration: A judgement analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 52(1). 345–354. 21 indexed citations
14.
Adderley, Una, et al.. (2014). Topical agents and dressings for fungating wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014(5). CD003948–CD003948. 50 indexed citations
15.
Ashby, Rebecca L, Rhian Gabe, Shehzad Ali, et al.. (2014). Patient information sheet and consent form.
17.
Soares, Marta, Jo C Dumville, Rebecca L Ashby, et al.. (2012). Methods to Assess Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Further Research When Data Are Sparse. Medical Decision Making. 33(3). 415–436. 29 indexed citations
18.
Soares, Marta, Jo C Dumville, Rebecca L Ashby, et al.. (2011). Negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulcers: Evidence synthesis and the value of further research. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 3 indexed citations
19.
Adderley, Una. (2010). An interview with Spencer Winch. British Journal of Community Nursing. 15(Sup1). S32–S33. 1 indexed citations
20.
Adderley, Una & Carl Thompson. (2007). A study of the factors influencing how frequently district nurses re-apply compression bandaging. Journal of Wound Care. 16(5). 217–221. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026