Umar Daraz Khan
Impact in
- Surgery top 5%
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Body Contouring and Surgery
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
- Dermatology top 5%
- Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Papers in
- Surgery 46
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction 39
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 31
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 12
- Body Contouring and Surgery 9
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 11
- Co-authors
- Evangelos Keramidas (1 shared paper)C. S. Menon (1 shared paper)Megan Melland‐Smith (1 shared paper)Jensen C. C. Tan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (22 papers)Aesthetic Surgery Journal (2 papers)Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (1 paper)Hernia (1 paper)Nephron Clinical Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Umar Daraz Khan
44 papers receiving 557 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Surgery 584
- Dermatology 76
- Cancer Research 86
- Clinical Psychology 111
- Oncology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Umar Daraz Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Umar Daraz Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Umar Daraz Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umar Daraz Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Umar Daraz Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Umar Daraz Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Umar Daraz Khan. The network helps show where Umar Daraz Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Umar Daraz Khan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 84 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 9 |
About Umar Daraz Khan
Umar Daraz Khan is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research, Clinical Psychology, Dermatology and Oncology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (39 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (31 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (12 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (11 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (9 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (9 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (4 papers) and Lymphatic System and Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (584 citations), Dermatology (76 citations), Cancer Research (86 citations), Clinical Psychology (111 citations) and Oncology (52 citations). Umar Daraz Khan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Evangelos Keramidas, C. S. Menon, Megan Melland‐Smith and Jensen C. C. Tan. Their work appears in journals such as Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Hernia and Nephron Clinical Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.