Umair Khan
- Biomedical Engineering top 0.2%
- Mechanical Engineering top 0.2%
- Computational Mechanics top 0.1%
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment top 5%
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes top 2%
- Co-authors
- Aurang ZaibAnuar IshakDumitru BǎleanuEl‐Sayed M. SherifIoan PopIskandar WainiIlyas KhanAhmed M. Galal
- Topics
- Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer (271 papers)Heat Transfer Mechanisms (181 papers)Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (127 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American College of CardiologyScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- Saudi ArabiaPakistanMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Umair Khan
292 papers receiving 5.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Biomedical Engineering 5.0k
- Mechanical Engineering 4.0k
- Computational Mechanics 3.2k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 441
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 263
Countries citing papers authored by Umair Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Umair Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Umair Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umair Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Umair Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Umair Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Umair Khan. The network helps show where Umair Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Umair Khan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Umair Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Umair Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Umair Khan. Umair Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Umair Khan
Umair Khan is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 319 papers that have together received 5.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer (271 papers), Heat Transfer Mechanisms (181 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (127 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (3.2k citations), Biomedical Engineering (5.0k citations) and Mechanical Engineering (4.0k citations). Umair Khan has collaborated with scholars based in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Aurang Zaib, Anuar Ishak, Dumitru Bǎleanu, El‐Sayed M. Sherif, Ioan Pop, Iskandar Waini, Ilyas Khan, Ahmed M. Galal, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar and Abderrahim Wakif. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.