Ulrike Taylor

1.7k total citations
39 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Ulrike Taylor is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Materials Chemistry and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ulrike Taylor has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 12 papers in Materials Chemistry and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ulrike Taylor's work include Sperm and Testicular Function (17 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers) and Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (9 papers). Ulrike Taylor is often cited by papers focused on Sperm and Testicular Function (17 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (9 papers) and Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (9 papers). Ulrike Taylor collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Hungary and Spain. Ulrike Taylor's co-authors include Stephan Barcikowski, Wilfried A. Kues, Detlef Rath, D. Rath, Sabine Klein, Christoph Rehbock, Daniela Tiedemann, Annette Barchanski, Holm Zerbe and Svea Petersen and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and The Analyst.

In The Last Decade

Ulrike Taylor

38 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ulrike Taylor Germany 21 449 393 361 323 259 39 1.4k
Detlef Rath Germany 18 335 0.7× 318 0.8× 279 0.8× 328 1.0× 207 0.8× 43 1.1k
Yonglian Zhang China 25 210 0.5× 469 1.2× 125 0.3× 262 0.8× 1.1k 4.2× 72 2.0k
D. L. Black United States 20 267 0.6× 263 0.7× 108 0.3× 268 0.8× 87 0.3× 61 1.3k
Xiaojin He China 25 141 0.3× 882 2.2× 97 0.3× 659 2.0× 758 2.9× 118 1.9k
Toshitaka Horiuchi Japan 25 265 0.6× 890 2.3× 47 0.1× 1.2k 3.6× 441 1.7× 80 1.8k
Shang-Rung Wu Taiwan 18 216 0.5× 65 0.2× 276 0.8× 100 0.3× 312 1.2× 27 1.0k
Céline Jones United Kingdom 27 112 0.2× 1.4k 3.6× 79 0.2× 1.4k 4.3× 489 1.9× 58 2.1k
Haiqing Sun China 25 875 1.9× 79 0.2× 129 0.4× 29 0.1× 213 0.8× 95 1.8k
Zdzisław Gajewski Poland 19 141 0.3× 78 0.2× 45 0.1× 141 0.4× 198 0.8× 110 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Taylor. The network helps show where Ulrike Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulrike Taylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulrike Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulrike Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulrike Taylor. Ulrike Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Yáñez-Ruíz, David R., Robert J. Gruninger, Gabriel O Ribeiro, et al.. (2017). Invited. Advances in Animal Biosciences. 8(1). 132–146. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rath, D., C. Knörr, & Ulrike Taylor. (2015). Communication requested: Boar semen transport through the uterus and possible consequences for insemination. Theriogenology. 85(1). 94–104. 19 indexed citations
4.
Rehbock, Christoph, Jurij Jakobi, Lisa Gamrad, et al.. (2014). Current state of laser synthesis of metal and alloy nanoparticles as ligand-free reference materials for nano-toxicological assays. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 5. 1523–1541. 122 indexed citations
5.
Rath, Detlef, et al.. (2013). Lectin affinity and binding properties of porcine epididymal sperm to uterine epithelial cells. OpenAgrar. 1 indexed citations
6.
Tiedemann, Daniela, Ulrike Taylor, Christoph Rehbock, et al.. (2013). Reprotoxicity of gold, silver, and gold–silver alloy nanoparticles on mammalian gametes. The Analyst. 139(5). 931–942. 146 indexed citations
7.
Taylor, Ulrike, et al.. (2012). Cryopreservation of semen from genetic resource chicken lines. 62(3). 151–158. 19 indexed citations
8.
Rath, D., Stephan Barcikowski, G. de, et al.. (2012). Sex selection of sperm in farm animals: status report and developmental prospects. Reproduction. 145(1). R15–R30. 63 indexed citations
9.
Taylor, Ulrike, Annette Barchanski, Wilfried A. Kues, Stephan Barcikowski, & D. Rath. (2012). Impact of Metal Nanoparticles on Germ Cell Viability and Functionality. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 47(s4). 359–368. 28 indexed citations
10.
Garrels, Wiebke, Lajos Mátés, Ulrike Taylor, et al.. (2011). Germline Transgenic Pigs by Sleeping Beauty Transposition in Porcine Zygotes and Targeted Integration in the Pig Genome. PLoS ONE. 6(8). e23573–e23573. 92 indexed citations
11.
Barchanski, Annette, Ulrike Taylor, Sabine Klein, et al.. (2011). Golden Perspective: Application of Laser‐Generated Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates in Reproductive Biology. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 46(s3). 42–52. 32 indexed citations
12.
Garrels, Wiebke, Ulrike Taylor, Doris Herrmann, et al.. (2011). Genotype-Independent Transmission of Transgenic Fluorophore Protein by Boar Spermatozoa. PLoS ONE. 6(11). e27563–e27563. 17 indexed citations
13.
Taylor, Ulrike, et al.. (2010). Influence of inseminate components on the presence of leukocytes and spermatozoa in the porcine uterus 2 hours after artificial insemination (AI). Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 45. 66–66. 2 indexed citations
14.
Sieg, B., et al.. (2010). Influence of sodium fluoride on the lifespan of sex sorted bovine spermatozoa. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 45. 68–68. 3 indexed citations
15.
Nowak‐Imialek, Monika, Wilfried A. Kues, Cornelia Rudolph, et al.. (2010). Preferential Loss of Porcine Chromosomes in Reprogrammed Interspecies Cell Hybrids. Cellular Reprogramming. 12(1). 55–65. 11 indexed citations
16.
Klein, Sabine, Svea Petersen, Ulrike Taylor, Detlef Rath, & Stephan Barcikowski. (2010). Quantitative visualization of colloidal and intracellular gold nanoparticles by confocal microscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 15(3). 36015–36015. 74 indexed citations
17.
Taylor, Ulrike, Sabine Klein, Svea Petersen, et al.. (2010). Nonendosomal cellular uptake of ligand‐free, positively charged gold nanoparticles. Cytometry Part A. 77A(5). 439–446. 83 indexed citations
18.
Rath, D., H. J. Schuberth, Pilar Coy, & Ulrike Taylor. (2008). Sperm Interactions from Insemination to Fertilization. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 43(s5). 2–11. 43 indexed citations
19.
Taylor, Ulrike, Holm Zerbe, Hans‐Martin Seyfert, et al.. (2008). Porcine spermatozoa inhibit post-breeding cytokine induction in uterine epithelial cells in vivo. Animal Reproduction Science. 115(1-4). 279–289. 39 indexed citations
20.
Schuberth, Hans‐Joachim, Ulrike Taylor, Holm Zerbe, et al.. (2008). Immunological responses to semen in the female genital tract. Theriogenology. 70(8). 1174–1181. 72 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026