U.‐J. Wiese

3.8k total citations
80 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

U.‐J. Wiese is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, U.‐J. Wiese has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 40 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 25 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in U.‐J. Wiese's work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (40 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (30 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (27 papers). U.‐J. Wiese is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (40 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (30 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (27 papers). U.‐J. Wiese collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. U.‐J. Wiese's co-authors include Debasish Banerjee, P. Zoller, E. Rico, Shailesh Chandrasekharan, Richard C. Brower, Marcello Dalmonte, Michele Pepe, Pascal Stebler, Wolfgang Bietenholz and G. Schierholz and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

U.‐J. Wiese

79 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
U.‐J. Wiese Switzerland 26 1.3k 1.2k 724 433 185 80 2.4k
Shailesh Chandrasekharan United States 28 1.4k 1.1× 1.1k 0.9× 1.2k 1.7× 210 0.5× 166 0.9× 99 2.3k
Pasquale Sodano Italy 27 1.7k 1.3× 396 0.3× 646 0.9× 271 0.6× 806 4.4× 116 2.2k
P. M. Stevenson United States 22 905 0.7× 1.9k 1.6× 265 0.4× 227 0.5× 426 2.3× 56 2.8k
Christof Gattringer Austria 30 713 0.5× 2.2k 1.8× 732 1.0× 85 0.2× 188 1.0× 139 2.7k
Alessio Celi Spain 17 1.8k 1.4× 248 0.2× 428 0.6× 428 1.0× 278 1.5× 38 2.0k
Jon Magne Leinaas Norway 19 1.9k 1.5× 301 0.2× 478 0.7× 480 1.1× 546 3.0× 70 2.3k
Thomas Gasenzer Germany 28 2.4k 1.8× 294 0.2× 479 0.7× 374 0.9× 522 2.8× 79 2.6k
Tomotoshi Nishino Japan 24 1.5k 1.2× 170 0.1× 1.3k 1.8× 206 0.5× 299 1.6× 76 1.9k
Glen Evenbly United States 22 1.5k 1.1× 421 0.3× 829 1.1× 371 0.9× 385 2.1× 32 1.8k
J. Berges Germany 23 1.0k 0.8× 1.1k 0.9× 378 0.5× 136 0.3× 277 1.5× 38 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by U.‐J. Wiese

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U.‐J. Wiese's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U.‐J. Wiese with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U.‐J. Wiese more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U.‐J. Wiese

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U.‐J. Wiese. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U.‐J. Wiese. The network helps show where U.‐J. Wiese may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of U.‐J. Wiese

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of U.‐J. Wiese. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of U.‐J. Wiese based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with U.‐J. Wiese. U.‐J. Wiese is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Banerjee, Debasish, et al.. (2024). Broken symmetry and fractionalized flux strings in a staggered U(1) pure gauge theory. Physical review. D. 109(1). 2 indexed citations
2.
Wiese, U.‐J., et al.. (2024). Self-adjoint momentum operator for a particle confined in a multi-dimensional cavity. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 65(4). 1 indexed citations
3.
Herrmann, Joachım, et al.. (2023). Bouncing wave packets, Ehrenfest theorem, and uncertainty relation based upon a new concept for the momentum of a particle in a box. Annals of Physics. 452. 169289–169289. 4 indexed citations
4.
Huffman, Emilie, Debasish Banerjee, Shailesh Chandrasekharan, & U.‐J. Wiese. (2016). Real-time evolution of strongly coupled fermions driven by dissipation. Annals of Physics. 372. 309–319. 2 indexed citations
5.
Hebenstreit, F., et al.. (2015). Real-time dynamics of open quantum spin systems driven by dissipative processes. Physical Review B. 92(3). 7 indexed citations
6.
Marcos, D. Crespo, E. Rico, Mohammad Hafezi, et al.. (2014). Two-dimensional lattice gauge theories with superconducting quantum circuits. Annals of Physics. 351. 634–654. 71 indexed citations
7.
Wiese, U.‐J.. (2013). Ultracold quantum gases and lattice systems: quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories. Annalen der Physik. 525(10-11). 777–796. 256 indexed citations
8.
Banerjee, Debasish, M. Bögli, Marcello Dalmonte, et al.. (2013). Atomic Quantum Simulation ofU(N)andSU(N)Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories. Physical Review Letters. 110(12). 125303–125303. 197 indexed citations
9.
Banerjee, Debasish, Marcello Dalmonte, Markus Müller, et al.. (2012). Atomic Quantum Simulation of Dynamical Gauge Fields Coupled to Fermionic Matter: From String Breaking to Evolution after a Quench. Physical Review Letters. 109(17). 175302–175302. 239 indexed citations
10.
Gliozzi, F., Michele Pepe, & U.‐J. Wiese. (2010). Width of the Confining String in Yang-Mills Theory. Physical Review Letters. 104(23). 232001–232001. 44 indexed citations
11.
Pepe, Michele & U.‐J. Wiese. (2009). From Decay to Complete Breaking: Pulling the Strings inSU(2)Yang-Mills Theory. Physical Review Letters. 102(19). 191601–191601. 20 indexed citations
12.
Bietenholz, Wolfgang, et al.. (2008). Dimensional Reduction of Fermions in Brane Worlds of the Gross-Neveu Model. 8 indexed citations
13.
Jiang, Fu-Jiun, et al.. (2008). Nested Cluster Algorithm for Frustrated Quantum Antiferromagnets. Physical Review Letters. 100(24). 247206–247206. 14 indexed citations
14.
Chandrasekharan, Shailesh, et al.. (2003). Lattice Theories with Nonlinearly Realized Chiral Symmetry. 2 indexed citations
15.
Bietenholz, Wolfgang, et al.. (1995). Perfect lattice actions for the Gross-Neveu model at large N. Nuclear Physics B. 436(1-2). 385–413. 15 indexed citations
16.
Bietenholz, Wolfgang & U.‐J. Wiese. (1993). 1 Fixed Point Actions for Lattice Fermions. 6 indexed citations
17.
Göckeler, M., Andreas S. Kronfeld, M.L. Laursen, G. Schierholz, & U.‐J. Wiese. (1989). Can the topological susceptibility be calculated from SU(N) lattice gauge theories?. Physics Letters B. 233(1-2). 192–196. 40 indexed citations
18.
Kronfeld, Andreas S., M.L. Laursen, G. Schierholz, Chris Schleiermacher, & U.‐J. Wiese. (1989). A vectorized code for the computation of the topological charge in SU(2) lattice gauge theory. Computer Physics Communications. 54(1). 109–124. 2 indexed citations
19.
Wiese, U.‐J.. (1988). Confinement and the dynamics of magnetic monopoles. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 4. 358–365. 2 indexed citations
20.
Kronfeld, Andreas S., M.L. Laursen, G. Schierholz, & U.‐J. Wiese. (1987). High statistics computation of the topological susceptibility of SU(2) gauge theory. Nuclear Physics B. 292. 330–348. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shailesh Chandrasekharan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pasquale Sodano Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. M. Stevenson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christof Gattringer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alessio Celi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jon Magne Leinaas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas Gasenzer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tomotoshi Nishino Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Glen Evenbly Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Berges
Rankless by CCL
2026