Ugo Pretato
About
In The Last Decade
Ugo Pretato
7 papers receiving 286 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 109
- Environmental Engineering 94
- Food Science 92
- Strategy and Management 50
- Ecology 43
Countries citing papers authored by Ugo Pretato
This map shows the geographic impact of Ugo Pretato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ugo Pretato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ugo Pretato more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ugo Pretato
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ugo Pretato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ugo Pretato. The network helps show where Ugo Pretato may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ugo Pretato
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ugo Pretato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ugo Pretato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ugo Pretato. Ugo Pretato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 | |
| 2 | 117 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | Critical Review of the Current Research Needs and Limitations Related to ISO-LCA Practice | 47 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.