Uffe Schjødt

876 total citations
10 papers, 474 citations indexed

About

Uffe Schjødt is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Uffe Schjødt has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 474 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Health, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Uffe Schjødt's work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). Uffe Schjødt is often cited by papers focused on Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). Uffe Schjødt collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Finland. Uffe Schjødt's co-authors include Andreas Roepstorff, Joseph Bulbulia, Dimitris Xygalatas, Ivana Konvalinka, Else-Marie Elmholdt Jegindø, Guy Van Orden, Sebastian Wallot, Hans Stødkilde‐Jørgensen, Armin W. Geertz and Marjaana Lindeman and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Neuroscience Letters.

In The Last Decade

Uffe Schjødt

10 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Uffe Schjødt Denmark 5 249 181 149 83 77 10 474
Else-Marie Elmholdt Jegindø Denmark 7 245 1.0× 262 1.4× 113 0.8× 44 0.5× 91 1.2× 8 545
Gabriele Bellucci Germany 13 174 0.7× 280 1.5× 71 0.5× 24 0.3× 125 1.6× 26 479
Rolf Nelson United States 9 100 0.4× 254 1.4× 78 0.5× 34 0.4× 154 2.0× 15 512
Sunhae Sul South Korea 11 182 0.7× 250 1.4× 84 0.6× 16 0.2× 85 1.1× 26 432
Raluca Petrican Canada 12 98 0.4× 193 1.1× 43 0.3× 33 0.4× 88 1.1× 32 360
Daniel Randles Canada 5 246 1.0× 184 1.0× 77 0.5× 18 0.2× 152 2.0× 5 465
Wenfeng Zhu China 13 193 0.8× 198 1.1× 55 0.4× 29 0.3× 217 2.8× 26 494
Beatrix Lábadi Hungary 12 168 0.7× 104 0.6× 191 1.3× 23 0.3× 105 1.4× 29 493
Ruth Ogden United Kingdom 15 164 0.7× 441 2.4× 31 0.2× 21 0.3× 322 4.2× 48 718
Jeffrey P. Ebert United States 4 162 0.7× 299 1.7× 123 0.8× 10 0.1× 71 0.9× 10 456

Countries citing papers authored by Uffe Schjødt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Uffe Schjødt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uffe Schjødt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uffe Schjødt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Uffe Schjødt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uffe Schjødt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uffe Schjødt. The network helps show where Uffe Schjødt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Uffe Schjødt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Uffe Schjødt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Uffe Schjødt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Uffe Schjødt. Uffe Schjødt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Scrivner, Coltan, Marc Malmdorf Andersen, Uffe Schjødt, & Mathias Clasen. (2022). The Psychological Benefits of Scary Play in Three Types of Horror Fans. Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications. 35(2). 87–98. 10 indexed citations
2.
Mulukom, Valerie van, Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Theiss Bendixen, et al.. (2021). What do non-religious non-believers believe in? Secular worldviews around the world. Pure (Coventry University). 1 indexed citations
3.
Schjødt, Uffe, et al.. (2020). Sermons as data: Introducing a corpus of 11,955 Danish sermons. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 4 indexed citations
4.
Lindeman, Marjaana, et al.. (2019). Religious Unbelief in Three Western European Countries: Identifying and Characterizing Unbeliever Types Using Latent Class Analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 29(3). 184–203. 27 indexed citations
5.
Sosis, Richard, Joseph Bulbulia, Wesley J. Wildman, & Uffe Schjødt. (2018). The fish that got away? Human behavioral ecology and the study of religion. Religion Brain & Behavior. 8(4). 351–353. 1 indexed citations
6.
Sosis, Richard, Joseph Bulbulia, Wesley J. Wildman, & Uffe Schjødt. (2017). Religion, Brain & Behavior’s seventh year. Religion Brain & Behavior. 7(1). 1–2. 2 indexed citations
7.
Sosis, Richard, Wesley J. Wildman, Joseph Bulbulia, & Uffe Schjødt. (2017). Hilbert Problems in the scientific study of religion. Religion Brain & Behavior. 7(4). 277–278. 3 indexed citations
8.
Konvalinka, Ivana, Dimitris Xygalatas, Joseph Bulbulia, et al.. (2011). Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(20). 8514–8519. 355 indexed citations
9.
Schjødt, Uffe, Hans Stødkilde‐Jørgensen, Armin W. Geertz, & Andreas Roepstorff. (2008). Rewarding prayers. Neuroscience Letters. 443(3). 165–168. 60 indexed citations
10.
Schjødt, Uffe. (2007). Homeostasis and Religious Behaviour. Journal of Cognition and Culture. 7(3-4). 313–340. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026