Udo Seelmeyer
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
- Social Work Education and Practice
Papers in
-
- Innovation, Technology, and Society 7
- Sociology and Education Studies 7
- German legal, social, and political studies 1
-
- Social Policies and Healthcare Reform 7
- Co-authors
- Nadia Kutscher (4 shared papers)Philipp Cimiano (1 shared paper)Marcos Báez (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Technology in Human Services (2 papers)SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Sozialer Fortschritt (1 paper)Blätter der Wohlfahrtspflege (2 papers)Sozial Extra (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Udo Seelmeyer
12 papers receiving 92 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Public Administration 34
- Health Informatics 2
- General Health Professions 31
- Applied Psychology 6
- Sociology and Political Science 47
Countries citing papers authored by Udo Seelmeyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Udo Seelmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Udo Seelmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Udo Seelmeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Udo Seelmeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Udo Seelmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Udo Seelmeyer. The network helps show where Udo Seelmeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Udo Seelmeyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 3 | Professionalism and Information Technology: Positioning and Mediation | 2008 | 14 |
| 4 | Handbuch Soziale Arbeit und Digitalisierung | 2020 | 14 |
| 5 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 11 | Mediatisierung (in) der Sozialen Arbeit - Grundlagen der Sozialen Arbeit | 2015 | 2 |
| 12 | Mediatisierte Lebens- und Arbeitswelten. Herausforderung der Sozialen Arbeit durch die Digitalisierung | 2014 | 1 |
| 13 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 16 | Digitale Technologien in der Sozialen Arbeit | 2016 | 0 |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 |
About Udo Seelmeyer
Udo Seelmeyer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 110 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation, Technology, and Society (7 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (7 papers), Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (7 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers), Public Administration and Political Analysis (3 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper) and German legal, social, and political studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (34 citations), Health Informatics (2 citations), General Health Professions (31 citations), Applied Psychology (6 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (47 citations). Udo Seelmeyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nadia Kutscher, Philipp Cimiano and Marcos Báez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Technology in Human Services, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sozialer Fortschritt, Blätter der Wohlfahrtspflege and Sozial Extra.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.