Udo Seelmeyer

402 total citations
17 papers, 110 citations indexed

About

Udo Seelmeyer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Udo Seelmeyer has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 110 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Udo Seelmeyer's work include Sociology and Education Studies (7 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (7 papers) and Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (7 papers). Udo Seelmeyer is often cited by papers focused on Sociology and Education Studies (7 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (7 papers) and Social Policies and Healthcare Reform (7 papers). Udo Seelmeyer collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Udo Seelmeyer's co-authors include Nadia Kutscher, Philipp Cimiano and Marcos Báez and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Technology in Human Services and Sozialer Fortschritt.

In The Last Decade

Udo Seelmeyer

12 papers receiving 92 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Udo Seelmeyer Germany 6 47 34 31 21 11 17 110
Werner Thole Germany 5 91 1.9× 16 0.5× 12 0.4× 37 1.8× 14 1.3× 66 130
David Wagner United States 6 39 0.8× 26 0.8× 46 1.5× 8 0.4× 7 0.6× 24 107
Michael Winkler Germany 7 33 0.7× 7 0.2× 22 0.7× 41 2.0× 33 3.0× 48 126
Bernd Dollinger Germany 6 66 1.4× 19 0.6× 15 0.5× 12 0.6× 27 2.5× 64 115
Stephan Sting Austria 5 53 1.1× 8 0.2× 12 0.4× 12 0.6× 9 0.8× 28 84
Catherine Richardson United Kingdom 9 26 0.6× 3 0.1× 21 0.7× 8 0.4× 13 1.2× 35 162
Rob Canton United Kingdom 9 154 3.3× 29 0.9× 57 1.8× 3 0.1× 72 6.5× 23 185
Matthew Clark United Kingdom 7 14 0.3× 6 0.2× 8 0.3× 39 1.9× 6 0.5× 20 103
Frank Burchill United Kingdom 5 15 0.3× 19 0.6× 11 0.4× 22 1.0× 3 0.3× 8 75
Bertrand Ravon France 7 165 3.5× 5 0.1× 41 1.3× 10 0.5× 13 1.2× 23 186

Countries citing papers authored by Udo Seelmeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Udo Seelmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Udo Seelmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Udo Seelmeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Udo Seelmeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Udo Seelmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Udo Seelmeyer. The network helps show where Udo Seelmeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Udo Seelmeyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Udo Seelmeyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Udo Seelmeyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Udo Seelmeyer. Udo Seelmeyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2024). Conveying chatbot personality through conversational cues in social media messages. 2(1). 100044–100044. 10 indexed citations
2.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2024). Stationäre Videoberatung als neues Element im Blended Counseling. Sozial Extra. 48(3). 234–237.
4.
5.
Seelmeyer, Udo. (2020). Big Data & Künstliche Intelligenz – Neue Anforderungen an die Fachlichkeit in sozialen Berufen. Blätter der Wohlfahrtspflege. 167(3). 95–98. 1 indexed citations
6.
Kutscher, Nadia, et al.. (2020). Handbuch Soziale Arbeit und Digitalisierung. 14 indexed citations
8.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2019). Challenges in Using Big Data to Develop Decision Support Systems for Social Work in Germany. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 37(2-3). 113–128. 23 indexed citations
9.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2018). Der Einfluss der Algorithmen. Sozial Extra. 42(3). 21–24. 5 indexed citations
10.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2018). Der Wert der Sozialen Arbeit in der digitalen Gesellschaft. Sozial Extra. 42(4). 23–25. 5 indexed citations
11.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2017). Inquiry-Based Learning about Technologies in Social Work Education. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 35(1). 49–62. 16 indexed citations
12.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2016). Digitale Technologien in der Sozialen Arbeit.
13.
Kutscher, Nadia, et al.. (2015). Mediatisierung (in) der Sozialen Arbeit - Grundlagen der Sozialen Arbeit. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 2 indexed citations
14.
Kutscher, Nadia, et al.. (2014). Mediatisierte Lebens- und Arbeitswelten. Herausforderung der Sozialen Arbeit durch die Digitalisierung. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 161(3). 1 indexed citations
15.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2014). Dokumentation zwischen Legitimation, Steuerung und professioneller Selbstvergewisserung. Sozial Extra. 38(4). 51–55. 12 indexed citations
16.
Kutscher, Nadia, et al.. (2014). Mediatisierte Lebens- und Arbeitswelten. Blätter der Wohlfahrtspflege. 87–90. 4 indexed citations
17.
Seelmeyer, Udo, et al.. (2008). Professionalism and Information Technology: Positioning and Mediation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(2). 338–351. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026